Charlotte Tang

Charlotte Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and civil procedure. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charlotte Tang has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Non-joinder	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlotte Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charlotte Tang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Mohamed Shiyam v Tuff Offshore Engineering: Amendment, Joinder, Corporate Veil, Conspiracy(Jul 2021) Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charlotte Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charlotte Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Shiyam v Tuff Offshore Engineering: Amendment, Joinder, Corporate Veil, Conspiracy 29 Jul 2021 Mohamed Shiyam (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Jul 2021	Mohamed Shiyam (Plaintiff): Application dismissed in partPlaintiff's application to amend the claim by adding defendants and pleading new claims was largely dismissed, except for a minor payment amendment.
2	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2021	Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.