Chee Min Ping

Chee Min Ping is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and sentencing. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chee Min Ping has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	11 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marriage of Convenience	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatric Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chee Min Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chee Min Ping has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Dewi Sukowati: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Sep 2016) PP v Mohsen Bin Na’im: Misuse of Drugs Act, Illegal Importation of Diamorphine, Presumptions of Possession and Knowledge(Jul 2016) Faisal bin Tahar v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Enhanced Drug Consumption Sentence(Jun 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chee Min Ping's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	36%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2016	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chee Min Ping's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	4(36%)	36%
Won	7(64%)	64%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2015	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2016	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Dewi Sukowati: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 15 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	15 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of 18 years imprisonment imposedThe Public Prosecutor sought a sentence of 20 years, but the court imposed a sentence of 18 years.
2	PP v Mohsen Bin Na’im: Misuse of Drugs Act, Illegal Importation of Diamorphine, Presumptions of Possession and Knowledge 28 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyThe Prosecution succeeded in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the Accused committed the offence of importation of a controlled drug.
3	Faisal bin Tahar v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Enhanced Drug Consumption Sentence 30 Jun 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	30 Jun 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's sentence.
4	Guay Seng Tiong Nickson v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Sentencing in Fatal Traffic Accident 12 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence upheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant.
5	PP v Hamidah Binte Awang: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing 15 Oct 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 Oct 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Hamidah Binte Awang.
6	Public Prosecutor v Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Rebuttal of Presumption 28 Jun 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	28 Jun 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and convicted the Respondent on the charge preferred against him.
7	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	07 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of Hamidah Binte AwangHamidah Binte Awang was convicted for attempting to export not less than 1963.3g of methamphetamine.
8	Mehra Radhika v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Immigration Advantage 27 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant.
9	Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General: Application for Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance 26 Jun 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.
10	Yap Ah Lai v PP: Smuggling, Customs Act & Excise Duty Evasion 14 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	14 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced.
11	PP v Lim Ghim Peow: Culpable Homicide, Major Depressive Disorder & Sentencing Principles 26 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.