Chelva R Rajah

Chelva R Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child support and family law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stakeholder Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chelva R Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chelva R Rajah has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	50% of cases	Law Society v Kurubalan: Champerty, Legal Profession Act, and Professional Misconduct(Jul 2013) ZO v ZP: Appeals on Custody, Maintenance, and Division of Matrimonial Assets(May 2011) JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability(Dec 2010)
UniLegal LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution(Feb 2015)
Hin Tat Augustine & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking(May 2010)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	1 cases	17% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Tham Kok Leong Thomas: Solicitor Breaching Stakeholder Undertaking and Making Misleading Statements(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chelva R Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chelva R Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution 11 Feb 2015 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	11 Feb 2015	Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to strike out not grantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff’s action dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Law Society v Kurubalan: Champerty, Legal Profession Act, and Professional Misconduct 17 Jul 2013 Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju (Respondent)Lost	17 Jul 2013	Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju (Respondent): Suspension from practiceThe Respondent was suspended from practice for six months and ordered to pay costs. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	ZO v ZP: Appeals on Custody, Maintenance, and Division of Matrimonial Assets 24 May 2011 ZP (Respondent, Appellant)Won	24 May 2011	ZP (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in its entiretyAppeal allowed in its entirety regarding the exclusion of $395,000 from the pool of matrimonial assets and the equal division of the remaining assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 02 Dec 2010 JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2010	JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against the grant of the Interim Injunction was dismissed, but the Ancillary Orders were set aside.
5	Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking 19 May 2010 Teo Wai Cheong (Defendant)Lost	19 May 2010	Teo Wai Cheong (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Law Society of Singapore v Tham Kok Leong Thomas: Solicitor Breaching Stakeholder Undertaking and Making Misleading Statements 22 Dec 2005 Tham Kok Leong Thomas (Respondent)Lost	22 Dec 2005	Tham Kok Leong Thomas (Respondent): Suspended from practice for two yearsThe respondent was suspended from practice for a period of two years and ordered to pay the costs of the Law Society in the entire disciplinary proceedings.