Chen Lixin

Chen Lixin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chen Lixin has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cost-proofing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Champerty and maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chen Lixin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chen Lixin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Re Tantleff, Alan: Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings for Eagle Hospitality Trust Entities(Jun 2022) POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit(Feb 2022) POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chen Lixin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	35.3 parties avg	5.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chen Lixin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Tantleff, Alan: Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings for Eagle Hospitality Trust Entities 23 Jun 2022 Alan Tantleff (Applicant)Partial	23 Jun 2022	Alan Tantleff (Applicant): Application partially grantedApplication granted for S1 and S2, but a separate application is required for EH-REIT.
2	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit 17 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Neutral	17 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Judgment under the sub-heading of “Champerty and maintenance” remainsThe court's decision regarding champerty and maintenance remains unchanged despite the clarification on the security for costs.
3	POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty 02 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedPOA Recovery is to bear the costs of AD 26, fixed at S$85,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.