Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa

Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recusal of Judges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bill of costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee(Sep 2023) Biswas v Mukherjees: Recusal Application and Appeal for Extension of Time(Sep 2022) Biswas v Mukherjee: Retrial Application Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction & Abuse of Process(Apr 2022)
Ho Wong Law Practice LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	UWL v. UWM: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	53.8 parties avg	3.8	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheng Hiu Lam Larisa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	489,248.16	97,849.635 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee 14 Sep 2023 Gouri Mukherjee (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Sep 2023	Gouri Mukherjee (Plaintiff, Respondent): Successful in opposing the appeals and applicationsAppeals and applications by Pradeepto Kumar Biswas dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Biswas v Mukherjees: Recusal Application and Appeal for Extension of Time 29 Sep 2022 Sabyasachi Mukherjee (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2022	Sabyasachi Mukherjee (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of S$12,000 for OA 2 and S$20,000 on an indemnity basis for SUM 15 awarded against the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Biswas v Mukherjee: Retrial Application Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction & Abuse of Process 10 Apr 2022 Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2022	Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for a new trial was dismissed and indemnity costs of SGD 20,000 were awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CIM v CIN: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Delivery of Clinker 31 Mar 2021 CIN (Defendant)Won	31 Mar 2021	CIN (Defendant): Originating summons dismissedThe court dismissed the originating summons, upholding the arbitration award in favor of CIN.
5	WIH v WII: Appeal Against Taxation of Solicitors' Bills of Costs in Divorce Proceedings 09 Jan 2020 WII (Respondent)Won	09 Jan 2020	WII (Respondent): Application allowedApplication for taxation of solicitors’ bills of costs allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	UWL v. UWM: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce 29 Jul 2019 UWL (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Jul 2019	UWL (Plaintiff): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe Plaintiff was awarded 55% of the net value of the River Valley property ($308,632.04) and entitled to $385,248.16 worth of the remaining assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.