Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam

Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Methamphetamine Withdrawal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of submission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside enforcement order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Advisory	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Factual Inferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	6 cases	43% of cases	CDI v CDJ: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Arbitration Award for Vessel Sale(Jun 2020) Public Prosecutor v Punithan: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act and Penal Code(May 2020) PP v Mohamed Ansari & Murugesan: Voluntariness of Statements in Drug Trafficking Case(Nov 2019)
Withers KhattarWong LLP	4 cases	29% of cases	Saridewi Binte Djamani v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Statements(Oct 2022) PP v Mohamed Ansari: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2022) Public Prosecutor v Saridewi Binte Djamani: Remittal Hearing on Methamphetamine Withdrawal & Reliability of Statements(Jun 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	14% of cases	Straits Advisors v Behringer: Construction of Consultancy Agreement & IPO Activation(Nov 2009) Ng Chee Chuan v Ng Ai Tee: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute(Mar 2009)
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 cases	7% of cases	BLC v BLB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Jul 2014)
Lawrence Quahe & Woo LLC	1 cases	7% of cases	BLB v BLC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Decide Counterclaim(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.1 parties avg	2.1	57%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	21%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(57%)	57%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	2(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	304,164.21	60,832.845 cases	5
USD	335,000.00	335,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Saridewi Binte Djamani v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Statements 05 Oct 2022 Saridewi Binte Djamani (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2022	Saridewi Binte Djamani (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSaridewi's appeal against her conviction and sentence was dismissed.
2	PP v Mohamed Ansari: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2022 Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2022	Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant): Convicted as chargedAccused convicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
3	Public Prosecutor v Saridewi Binte Djamani: Remittal Hearing on Methamphetamine Withdrawal & Reliability of Statements 27 Jun 2022 Saridewi Binte Djamani (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2022	Saridewi Binte Djamani (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe court found no reason to depart from its conclusion at the trial in relation to Saridewi’s guilt.
4	Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd v Pawan Kumar Jagetia: Breach of Employment Contract & Implied Terms 04 Apr 2022 Pawan Kumar Jagetia (Defendant)Partial	04 Apr 2022	Pawan Kumar Jagetia (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for repatriation allowance, 2018 CSAPL STI, CIPL STI, and salary in lieu of notice. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CDI v CDJ: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Arbitration Award for Vessel Sale 18 Jun 2020 CDJ (Defendant)Lost	18 Jun 2020	CDJ (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application to set aside the Leave Order was dismissed. The Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff the sum of US$335,000, the payment of which was to be made by the Defendant to the Plaintiff either by procuring the release and return to the Plaintiff of the sum paid into the Defendant’s nominated account or by paying the sum to the Plaintiff directly. The Arbitrator also awarded interest on the sum at the rate of 2% per annum from the date of the Notice of Arbitration until payment.
6	Public Prosecutor v Punithan: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act and Penal Code 14 May 2020 Punithan a/l Genasan (Defendant)Lost	14 May 2020	Punithan a/l Genasan (Defendant): LostThe accused was convicted of the charge.
7	PP v Mohamed Ansari & Murugesan: Voluntariness of Statements in Drug Trafficking Case 13 Nov 2019 Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant)Partial	13 Nov 2019	Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant): Statements inadmissible in partSome of the defendant's statements were ruled inadmissible.
8	Law Society of Singapore v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Grossly Improper Conduct 08 Apr 2019 Ezekiel Peter Latimer (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2019	Ezekiel Peter Latimer (Respondent): SanctionedThe respondent was suspended for three years and ordered to pay costs of S$10,000 to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Tan Chin Lay Evelyn v Cheng Soo May Stacy: Amendment of Pleadings Dispute 06 Nov 2018 Cheng Soo May Stacy (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Neutral	06 Nov 2018	Cheng Soo May Stacy (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against AR Lee’s decision on costs in SUM 5415/2017 was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
10	PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2016 Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2016	Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe defendant was found guilty of importing a Class A controlled drug and sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment.
11	BLC v BLB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 29 Jul 2014 BLC and others (Appellant)Won	29 Jul 2014	BLC and others (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. The usual consequential orders will follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	BLB v BLC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Decide Counterclaim 29 Sep 2013 BLC (Defendant)Partial	29 Sep 2013	BLC (Defendant): Partial LossApplication allowed in part; Disputed Counterclaim for Receivables and costs remitted to a new tribunal for determination.
13	Straits Advisors v Behringer: Construction of Consultancy Agreement & IPO Activation 17 Nov 2009 Straits Advisors Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	17 Nov 2009	Straits Advisors Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Ng Chee Chuan v Ng Ai Tee: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute 03 Mar 2009 Ng Chee Chuan (Appellant)Won	03 Mar 2009	Ng Chee Chuan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed with costs.