Cheong Wei Wen John

Cheong Wei Wen John is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Margin Loan Facility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loan-to-Value Ratio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Margin Ratio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Force Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium Application	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bought-Sold Note	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Wei Wen John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheong Wei Wen John has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2024) Asian Eco Technology v Deng Yiming: Striking Out Pleadings & Abuse of Process(Sep 2023) X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd v Metech International Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application(Sep 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheong Wei Wen John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	71%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	52.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheong Wei Wen John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	715,894.54	238,631.513 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 24 Oct 2024 Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd (Applicant)Lost	24 Oct 2024	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the Award was dismissed and Siddiqsons was ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to New Metallurgy (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Asian Eco Technology v Deng Yiming: Striking Out Pleadings & Abuse of Process 13 Sep 2023 Deng Yiming (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2023	Deng Yiming (Defendant): Application granted againstApplication to expunge the Offending Materials granted, save for paragraph 5 of Deng’s Defence.
3	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd v Metech International Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application 07 Sep 2023 X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	07 Sep 2023	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application for judicial management order allowedThe court allowed the applicant's application for a judicial management order.
4	Asian Eco Technology v Deng Yiming: Summary Judgment for Diamond Seed and Loose Diamond Recovery 16 Aug 2023 Deng Yiming (Defendant)Lost	16 Aug 2023	Deng Yiming (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; ordered to pay damages to be assessed and costs and disbursements.
5	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd v Metech International Ltd: Striking Out Scandalous Affidavit Evidence in Judicial Management Application 25 Jul 2023 X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	25 Jul 2023	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application to expunge documents allowedThe court allowed the non-party's application to expunge documents from the applicant's affidavit.
6	Wong Shu Kiat v Chen Jinping Michelle: Contractual Debt, Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute 19 Apr 2023 Wan Jin (Serangoon) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Apr 2023	Wan Jin (Serangoon) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the first defendant is to pay the plaintiffs the sum of $340,447.27 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Judah Value Activist Fund v Open Faith Investment Ltd: Breach of Contract & Causation in Share Transfer Agreement 01 Jul 2021 Judah Value Activist Fund (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Judah Value Activist Fund (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages was rejected by the court.