Cheryl Koh

Cheryl Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and damages assessment. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheryl Koh has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dynamic Currency Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Software Patent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Notes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Network Leasing Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheryl Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheryl Koh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	83% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes(Apr 2010) Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit(Sep 2009)
M/s Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Main-Line v UOB & FCC: Patent Infringement, Dynamic Currency Conversion, Account of Profits(Dec 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheryl Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.5
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	510.0 parties avg	10.0	83%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheryl Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Partial	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	6,391,182.00	6,391,182.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Main-Line v UOB & FCC: Patent Infringement, Dynamic Currency Conversion, Account of Profits 19 Dec 2011 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Dec 2011	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): Account of profits orderedAccount of profits ordered against United Overseas Bank Limited.
2	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Silverlink Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2010	Silverlink Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantSilverlink and/or Argent are to pay Superon the principal sum of US$6,391,182.00, interest at 5% per annum and redemption premium at 10% per annum computed from 15 July 2003 to 30 June 2008.
3	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes 25 Apr 2010 Argent Holdings Limited (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2010	Argent Holdings Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; the court will hear parties as to the appropriate remedies and relief before making any order herein. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit 16 Sep 2009 Symphony Capital Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2009	Symphony Capital Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to expunge passages from affidavits dismissedDefendant's application under Summons No 4794 of 2009 is dismissed.
5	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jul 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for extension of time substantially rejectedThe plaintiff's application for a further extension of time to file affidavits was substantially rejected.
6	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Reply Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	19 Jul 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Application granted in part and denied in partThe plaintiff's application for extension of time to file reply affidavits was granted in part for Mr. S P Slattery's affidavit but denied for the affidavits responding to the defendant's experts. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.