Cheryl Monteiro

Cheryl Monteiro is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and defamation law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ship Design	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wire Rope Failure Analysis	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Engineering Consultancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheryl Monteiro has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheryl Monteiro has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim & Lim	2 cases	50% of cases	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore(Apr 2010) Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Defamation Claim Stayed Pending Malaysian Proceedings(Apr 2009)
Selvam LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Yeo Sing San v Sanmugam Murali: Derivative Action & Director's Duties(Feb 2016)
Bajwa and Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Sin Leng Industries v Ong Chai Teck: Amendment of Claim, Manufacturing Defects & Crane Wire Rope Failure(Feb 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheryl Monteiro's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	75%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheryl Monteiro's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	393,261.00	393,261.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Sing San v Sanmugam Murali: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 01 Feb 2016 Sanmugam Murali (Defendant)Lost	01 Feb 2016	Sanmugam Murali (Defendant): Leave to bring a derivative action granted against the defendantLeave to bring a derivative action in the name and on behalf of the second defendant, AYS Building Contractors Pte Ltd, was granted against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore 08 Apr 2010 Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly known as Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd) (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2010	Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly known as Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd) (Respondent): Enforcement of Corrected Award grantedUltrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to pay to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E. Hansen A/S) EUR 357,855.00 with interest 1.5% per month of:- i. EUR 7,892 from 25 March 2006 until payment; ii. EUR 100,000 from 14 April 2006 until payment; iii. EUR 863 from 3 May 2006 until payment; iv. EUR 249,100 from 30 June 2006 until payment; within 14 days from the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 23,406 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hanswen A/S) as costs of the arbitration case within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 12,000 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) as costs of Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009).
3	Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Defamation Claim Stayed Pending Malaysian Proceedings 20 Apr 2009 Chan Chin Cheung (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	20 Apr 2009	Chan Chin Cheung (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the stay of proceedings was dismissed.
4	Sin Leng Industries v Ong Chai Teck: Amendment of Claim, Manufacturing Defects & Crane Wire Rope Failure 13 Feb 2006 Kiswire Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	13 Feb 2006	Kiswire Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the third defendant, Kiswire Sdn Bhd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.