Cheryl Nah

Cheryl Nah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and patents. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheryl Nah has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unlawful means conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dynamic Currency Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheryl Nah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheryl Nah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	4 cases	100% of cases	UOB v Lippo Marina: Discovery & Litigation Privilege in Fraud & Conspiracy Suit(Jan 2017) Main-Line Corp v UOB & First Currency Choice: Patent Infringement, Damages Assessment(Dec 2016) Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conspiracy(Jun 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheryl Nah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheryl Nah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,207,167.45	735,722.483 cases	3
USD	8,127,664.02	8,127,664.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UOB v Lippo Marina: Discovery & Litigation Privilege in Fraud & Conspiracy Suit 18 Jan 2017 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Jan 2017	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Specific discovery of the Affidavit is disallowed.The plaintiff's request for specific discovery of the Affidavit was denied.
2	Main-Line Corp v UOB & First Currency Choice: Patent Infringement, Damages Assessment 27 Dec 2016 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	27 Dec 2016	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): No Further AwardNo further award on the Plaintiff’s claim against United Overseas Bank Ltd as the interim payment already satisfied the liability (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conspiracy 27 Jun 2016 Beyonics International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jun 2016	Beyonics International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of S$172,867.45 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sharikat Logistics v Ong Boon Chuan: Minority Oppression & Shareholder Dispute 04 Nov 2014 Sharikat Logistics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Nov 2014	Sharikat Logistics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedTGDPL shall forthwith purchase Sharikat’s shares in the Company at the price of $2,034,300 less the outstanding amount owed to the Company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).