Chew Chang Min

Chew Chang Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and construction contracts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chew Chang Min has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Forest Pleadings	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Chang Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chew Chang Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chancery Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	TTJ Design v Chip Eng Seng: Striking Out Pleadings for Lack of Causation in Construction Sub-Contract Dispute(Jan 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chew Chang Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chew Chang Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,500.00	2,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TTJ Design v Chip Eng Seng: Striking Out Pleadings for Lack of Causation in Construction Sub-Contract Dispute 13 Jan 2011 Chip Eng Seng Contractors (1988) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	13 Jan 2011	Chip Eng Seng Contractors (1988) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $2,500.00 to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.