Chew Ching Li

Chew Ching Li is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chew Ching Li has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Planning	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inter-spousal Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Ching Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chew Ching Li has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance(Jan 2011) Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Loan Recovery & Conspiracy Claim(Jun 2010) Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline: Divorce Granted Due to Husband's Unreasonable Behaviour under Women's Charter(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chew Ching Li's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chew Ching Li's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,205,000.00	2,401,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance 13 Jan 2011 Quek Seow Kee (Defendant)Partial	13 Jan 2011	Quek Seow Kee (Defendant): PartialOrdered to pay the plaintiff 35% of the net asset value of the matrimonial home and 25% of the other matrimonial assets. The court also ordered the defendant to pay monthly maintenance of $2000. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
2	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Loan Recovery & Conspiracy Claim 07 Jun 2010 Neo Kok Eng (Defendant)Lost	07 Jun 2010	Neo Kok Eng (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline: Divorce Granted Due to Husband's Unreasonable Behaviour under Women's Charter 27 Oct 2009 Tan Lay Ying Angeline (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2009	Tan Lay Ying Angeline (Respondent): Divorce GrantedDivorce granted on the ground that the marriage had irretrievably broken down because the appellant had acted in such a way that the Wife could not reasonably be expected to live with him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Lim Lian Choon: Employee Breach of Duty & Amendment of Pleadings 01 Dec 2008 Lim Lian Choon (Defendant)Lost	01 Dec 2008	Lim Lian Choon (Defendant): Application to amend pleadings grantedThe defendant opposed the plaintiff's application to amend its Reply and Defence to Counterclaim, but the application was granted, allowing the plaintiff to include a specific incident of the defendant's alleged wrongful disposal of equipment.