Chew Kei-Jin

Chew Kei-Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 55 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and winding up. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 19 complex cases, representing 35% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated expertise across 168 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	35 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 35 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	23 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	19 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	15 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	14 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	13 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	12 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Procedures	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resealing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedial Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best effort obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obligations imposed	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fictitious Purchase Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidators	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Meetings Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Management Councils	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Promoter Employment Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malaysian Industrial Court Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offshore case	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tort of conspiracy to injure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-solicitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Springboard injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Holding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exclusion of appellate jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Title	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Petition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inquiry Committee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Deed Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed of Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chew Kei-Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chew Kei-Jin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 32 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	32 cases	58% of cases	Ezion Holdings v Teras Cargo: Shareholder Rights to Financial Info Under Companies Act(Aug 2016) Teras Offshore v Teras Cargo: Offshore Case & Summary Judgment in SICC for Contract Dispute(Jun 2016) Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability(Apr 2016)
Ascendant Legal LLC	20 cases	36% of cases	Liberty Engineering v Renault: Guarantee, Contractual Terms & French Law(Oct 2024) Renault SAS v Liberty Engineering Group: Stay of Enforcement and Winding-Up Application(Jul 2024) CIX v DGN: Res Judicata & Tort Claims Against Expert After Arbitration Loss(May 2024)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	3 cases	5% of cases	Korea Exchange Bank v Standard Chartered Bank: Letter of Credit Discrepancies and UCP 500 Interpretation(Nov 2005) Tan Chwee Chye v P V RM Kulandayan Chettiar: Adverse Possession Claim Between Co-Owners(Oct 2005) Standard Chartered Bank v Korea Exchange Bank: Construction of Letters of Credit & Admissibility of Expert Evidence(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chew Kei-Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 19 (35%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	193.3 parties avg	3.3	35%
Neutral	55.1 parties avg	5.1	9%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Partial	64.3 parties avg	4.3	11%
Won	244.0 parties avg	4.0	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	84.9 parties avg	4.9
2005	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2009	45.1 parties avg	5.1
2010	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2012	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2020	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2021	55.9 parties avg	5.9
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	42.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chew Kei-Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	19(35%)	35%
Neutral	5(9%)	9%
Other	1(2%)	2%
Partial	6(11%)	11%
Won	24(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	10,500,051.22	5,250,025.612 cases	2
SGD	122,367.12	4,219.5629 cases	29
USD	43,036,619.71	21,518,309.862 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	8 22121	Lost: 2 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (25.0%) Other: 1 cases (12.5%) Partial: 2 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2005	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	4 13	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 55 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liberty Engineering v Renault: Guarantee, Contractual Terms & French Law 07 Oct 2024 Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2024	Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd was ordered to pay 50% of Renault's costs.
2	Renault SAS v Liberty Engineering Group: Stay of Enforcement and Winding-Up Application 14 Jul 2024 Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant, Applicant)Partial	14 Jul 2024	Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant, Applicant): Conditional Stay GrantedEnforcement of the judgment is stayed on condition of payment into court of the judgment sum and interest calculated to 31 July 2024.
3	CIX v DGN: Res Judicata & Tort Claims Against Expert After Arbitration Loss 23 May 2024 DGN (Defendant)Won	23 May 2024	DGN (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff is ordered to pay indemnity costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Renault SAS v Liberty Engineering: Guarantee, Contractual Terms & Pleading 13 Feb 2024 Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Feb 2024	Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant in Originating Application No 3 of 2023.
5	Renault SAS v Liberty Engineering: Guarantee Construction & Bankruptcy Event 18 May 2023 Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 May 2023	Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	EFG Bank AG v Surewin Worldwide: Costs Allocation After Security Interest Ruling 30 Jan 2022 EFG Wealth Solutions (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	30 Jan 2022	EFG Wealth Solutions (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant): Not entitled to recover costsThe third defendant shall not be entitled to recover any of its costs or disbursements of or incidental to this action from the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute 09 Jan 2022 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	09 Jan 2022	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; all outstanding amounts under the Loan Agreement are due and payable.
8	BTN v BTP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Earn Out Consideration Dispute 29 Nov 2021 BTP (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2021	BTP (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court upheld the arbitration award in favor of the defendant.
9	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 May 2021 BP Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	30 May 2021	BP Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedBP's appeal was dismissed, and the Bank's claims against it were reinstated.
10	CKR v CKT: Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Despite Pending Set Aside Applications 25 Apr 2021 CKR (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2021	CKR (Plaintiff): Leave to enforce awards grantedPlaintiffs were granted leave to enforce the Second Partial Award, the Final Award, and the Additional Final Award.
11	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance 11 Mar 2021 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Mar 2021	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCarlsberg's claim for repayment of the outstanding loan was dismissed as the court found that CSAPLH did not breach clause 2(c) of the Deed of Undertaking.
12	BTN v BTP: Costs Judgment for Setting Aside Arbitral Award Application 15 Feb 2021 BTQ (Defendant)Won	15 Feb 2021	BTQ (Defendant): Costs awarded in favorCosts of $50,000 plus disbursements of $6,183.56 awarded to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	BTN v BTP: Public Policy Exception & Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 20 Oct 2020 BTQ (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Oct 2020	BTQ (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Chan Sze Ying v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948: Adjournment of AGM & Election of Management Council 28 Apr 2020 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948 (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2020	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948 (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication against the defendant was dismissed.
15	Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause 03 Mar 2020 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Mar 2020	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings granted in partThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.
16	Materials Industry v. Vopak Terminals: Dispute over PME Cargo Disposal and Contractual Lien 27 Nov 2019 Vopak Terminals Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	27 Nov 2019	Vopak Terminals Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
17	BTN v BTP: Review of Arbitral Award on Jurisdiction and Res Judicata in Termination Dispute 15 Sep 2019 BTQ (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2019	BTQ (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs.
18	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 21 May 2018 PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama (Defendant, Respondent)Won	21 May 2018	PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama (Defendant, Respondent): Conversion Claim stayed in favour of arbitrationThe Conversion Claim against TPPI was stayed in favour of arbitration pursuant to s 6 of the International Arbitration Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice 19 Oct 2017 Scott Ohanesian (Defendant)Won	19 Oct 2017	Scott Ohanesian (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant, Scott Ohanesian.
20	L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation 08 Jan 2017 Maniach Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2017	Maniach Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the court hearing the oppression action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Ezion Holdings v Teras Cargo: Shareholder Rights to Financial Info Under Companies Act 29 Aug 2016 Teras Cargo Transport Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Won	29 Aug 2016	Teras Cargo Transport Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Application deniedApplication for financial statements was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Teras Offshore v Teras Cargo: Offshore Case & Summary Judgment in SICC for Contract Dispute 21 Jun 2016 Teras Cargo Transport (America) LLC (Defendant)Lost	21 Jun 2016	Teras Cargo Transport (America) LLC (Defendant): Application for summary judgment dismissedDefendant's application for summary judgment on its counterclaim for reimbursement of freight tax was dismissed.
23	Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability 21 Apr 2016 Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2016	Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedPlaintiff successfully opposed the defendant's application to stay the proceedings in favour of arbitration.
24	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection 02 Aug 2015 Howden Insurance Brokers (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Aug 2015	Howden Insurance Brokers (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application Dismissed in PartApplication for 'springboard' injunctions dismissed, but injunctions against disclosure of confidential information and solicitation of employees granted against other defendants.
25	OCBC Capital Investment v Wong: Contract Formation & Risk Participation Agreement 27 Sep 2012 Wong Hua Choon (Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2012	Wong Hua Choon (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Respondent liable for costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
26	Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations 06 Aug 2012 APRIL Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	06 Aug 2012	APRIL Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff the six sums set out in Appendix B to the Agreement on the dates prescribed therein commencing on 2 March 2012 and ending on 1 April 2013. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff interest on any late payment of any of the sums from the date each is due to the date of payment at the usual rate. In addition, the defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff costs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Holland Leedon v Metalform: Breach of Warranty & Damages Calculation 29 Apr 2012 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2012	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	OCBC Capital Investment v Wong Hua Choon: Oral Agreement & Intention to Be Bound 02 Feb 2012 Wong Hua Choon (Defendant)Won	02 Feb 2012	Wong Hua Choon (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Wong Hua Choon was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi 29 Sep 2011 General Nice Resources (Hong Kong) Limited (Defendant)Won	29 Sep 2011	General Nice Resources (Hong Kong) Limited (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication against General Nice Resources dismissed with costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Holland Leedon v Metalform Asia: Application for Leave to Appeal Arbitration Decision 13 Feb 2011 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	13 Feb 2011	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Leave to appeal deniedThe Defendant's application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision made on 17 September 2010 in Originating Summons No 1679 of 2007 was denied.
31	Holland Leedon v Metalform Asia: Appeal for Leave on Arbitrator's Decision Regarding SPA Interpretation 16 Sep 2010 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Purchaser)Lost	16 Sep 2010	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Purchaser): Leave to appeal granted to other partyThe court granted the applicant leave to appeal the arbitrator's decision. No monetary amount was specified.
32	Chee Mu Lin Muriel v Chee Ka Lin Caroline: Validity of Will Dispute over Madam Goh's Estate 03 Aug 2010 Chee Ping Chian Alexander (Interveners)Neutral	03 Aug 2010	Chee Ping Chian Alexander (Interveners): NeutralNo order of costs for the interveners. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Chee Mu Lin Muriel v Chee Ka Lin Caroline: Validity of Will Dispute 13 Oct 2009 Maureen Chee (Intervener)Neutral	13 Oct 2009	Maureen Chee (Intervener): Supported Defendant's CaseThe Intervener supported the defendant's case.
34	Kirkham v Trane: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum in Distributorship Dispute 14 Jul 2009 PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Appellant)Won	14 Jul 2009	PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded to the Appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Variation & Escrow Sum Dispute 30 Jun 2009 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Jun 2009	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedHolland Leedon's application to vary the injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	Trane US Inc v Stott: Extension of Time for Defence Pending Stay Application Appeal 08 Mar 2009 PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant)Won	08 Mar 2009	PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant): Extension of Time GrantedExtension of time to file a defence was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	Trane US v Stott: Anti-Suit Injunction & Forum Non Conveniens in Distribution Agreement Dispute 25 Dec 2008 PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2008	PT Tatasolusi Pratama (Defendant): Application for anti-suit injunction granted against defendantApplication for anti-suit injunction granted against the defendant, restraining it from commencing or continuing with court proceedings in Indonesia. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties 12 Aug 2008 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Aug 2008	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out portions of the statement of claim was dismissed with costs.
39	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak: Costs in Withdrawn Enforcement Proceedings 24 Oct 2006 Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Respondent)Partial	24 Oct 2006	Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Respondent): Partial Costs AwardedThe respondent is to be paid its costs by the applicant after 30 March 2006. Each party is to bear its own costs from the commencement of proceedings until 30 March 2006. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan: Setting Aside Ex Parte Order in Arbitration Enforcement 17 Aug 2006 Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Respondent)Lost	17 Aug 2006	Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent's opposition to the applicant's oral application to set aside the ex parte order was dismissed.
41	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty 04 May 2006 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2006	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the defendant from presenting a winding-up petition was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	Korea Exchange Bank v Standard Chartered Bank: Letter of Credit Discrepancies and UCP 500 Interpretation 28 Nov 2005 Korea Exchange Bank (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2005	Korea Exchange Bank (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Tan Chwee Chye v P V RM Kulandayan Chettiar: Adverse Possession Claim Between Co-Owners 25 Oct 2005 Ng Chek Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2005	Ng Chek Seng (Plaintiff): Order of Court dated 10 July 2002 is set asideOrder of Court dated 10 July 2002 is set aside with costs to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	Standard Chartered Bank v Korea Exchange Bank: Construction of Letters of Credit & Admissibility of Expert Evidence 13 Apr 2005 Korea Exchange Bank (Applicant, Defendant)Won	13 Apr 2005	Korea Exchange Bank (Applicant, Defendant): Application grantedKorea Exchange Bank's application to adduce further evidence was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
45	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure 11 Oct 2001 Mr. Ponniah (Appellant)Neutral	11 Oct 2001	Mr. Ponniah (Appellant): No order as to costsNo costs awarded due to conduct contributing to the litigation.
46	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Oppression of Minority Shareholders 10 Oct 2001 Fraser & Neave Limited (Applicant, Respondent)Other	10 Oct 2001	Fraser & Neave Limited (Applicant, Respondent): -
47	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Appeal Timing & Interlocutory Orders in Defamation Case 10 Oct 2001 Fraser & Neave Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	10 Oct 2001	Fraser & Neave Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Motion OpposedF&N and others opposed the motion of Aberdeen & Young, but the motion was allowed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
48	Subbiah Pillai v Wong Meng Meng: Natural Justice in Legal Profession Disciplinary Inquiry 19 Jul 2001 Wong Meng Meng (Respondent)Won	19 Jul 2001	Wong Meng Meng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
49	PCChip Computer v OCBC: Mistaken Bank Payment & Liquidator's Duty 12 Jun 2001 PCChip Computer Manufacturer (S) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Defendant)Lost	12 Jun 2001	PCChip Computer Manufacturer (S) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Defendant): Order to pay bank the sum of USD85,790The court directed the liquidators to pay the bank the sum of USD85,790 being the amount that had been paid over by mistake.
50	Fraser & Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Neutral	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Order accordinglyCourt determined the natural and ordinary meaning of the words in the letter.
51	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe court varied the Assistant Registrar's ruling on the meaning of the words in question.
52	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over Minority Shareholder Treatment 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal against Assistant Registrar’s construction of the words variedThe High Court varied the Assistant Registrar’s construction of the words in question.
53	Subbiah Pillai v Wong Meng Meng: Natural Justice in Law Society Inquiry Committee Proceedings 22 Oct 2000 Wong Meng Meng (Respondent)Won	22 Oct 2000	Wong Meng Meng (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
54	Khoo Tian Hock v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Forged Cheques & Bank's Duty 31 Aug 2000 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Defendant)Won	31 Aug 2000	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
55	LKM Investment v Cathay Theatres: Restraining Winding Up Petition Based on Statutory Demand Validity & Abuse of Process 20 Jan 2000 Cathay Theatres Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2000	Cathay Theatres Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedCathay Theatres was restrained from presenting a winding up petition based on the statutory demand.