Chia Jin Chong Daniel

Chia Jin Chong Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 56.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Franchise Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accountancy Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Accountants)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Jin Chong Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chia Jin Chong Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Coleman Street Chambers LLC	7 cases	88% of cases	Golden Barley v BASP: Unjust Enrichment, Mistake of Fact, Failure of Consideration(Sep 2024) Shanghai Afute v. Tan Swee Meng: Franchise Agreement Dispute, Breach of Confidence, and Conspiracy(Feb 2023) Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd v Tan Yee Ling Ivy: Account Order & Payment for Misappropriated Dividends(Nov 2021)
W P Da Silva & Company	1 cases	13% of cases	PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chia Jin Chong Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.8
Complex Cases: 6 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	38%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	13%
Won	55.3 parties avg	5.3	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chia Jin Chong Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	5(56%)	56%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	751,990.46	187,997.624 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Golden Barley v BASP: Unjust Enrichment, Mistake of Fact, Failure of Consideration 15 Sep 2024 Golden Barley International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Sep 2024	Golden Barley International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shanghai Afute v. Tan Swee Meng: Franchise Agreement Dispute, Breach of Confidence, and Conspiracy 14 Feb 2023 Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Feb 2023	Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found in favor of the plaintiff on the claims of breach of contract, breach of confidence, and unlawful means conspiracy, granting inquiries into damages and an injunction against the defendant's use of the plaintiff's recipes.
3	Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd v Tan Yee Ling Ivy: Account Order & Payment for Misappropriated Dividends 25 Nov 2021 Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2021	Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Ivy was ordered to pay the sum of $631,285.62 to Exim forthwith (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project Dispute 12 Jul 2021 PT Karya Indo Batam (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	12 Jul 2021	PT Karya Indo Batam (Plaintiff, Respondent): Anti-suit injunction grantedPT Karya Indo Batam was restrained from pursuing actions in Indonesia relating to the Batam Project.
5	Shanghai Afute v Tan Swee Meng: Contempt of Court for Using Confidential Recipes 21 Jun 2021 Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jun 2021	Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedOrder of committal granted against the defendants.
6	iVenture Card v Big Bus: Breach of Contract, Inducement, Conspiracy & Damages in Tourism Pass Dispute 25 May 2020 Low Lee Huat (Defendant)Won	25 May 2020	Low Lee Huat (Defendant): WoniVenture’s claim against James and Low personally for inducing breach of contract dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Leow Kwee Huay v Public Accountants Oversight Committee: Appeal Against Cancellation of Accountant Registration 12 Sep 2016 Leow Kwee Huay (Appellant)Won	12 Sep 2016	Leow Kwee Huay (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the PAOC’s cancellation was substituted with a two-year suspension.
8	PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jan 2003 Ng Beng Siang (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2003	Ng Beng Siang (Defendant): Guilty verdict; mandatory death sentence imposedThe court found the first accused guilty and imposed the mandatory death sentence.