Chia Su Min Rebecca

Chia Su Min Rebecca is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witness gating	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remuneration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Su Min Rebecca has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chia Su Min Rebecca has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution(Aug 2024) Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA(May 2024) Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute(Feb 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chia Su Min Rebecca's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	35.3 parties avg	5.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	35.3 parties avg	5.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chia Su Min Rebecca's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution 07 Aug 2024 British and Malayan Trustees Ltd (Applicant)Won	07 Aug 2024	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedTrustees have the right to recoup the overpayments and sanctioning the terms of the Trustees’ plan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA 15 May 2024 Amalgamated Metal Trading Limited (Applicant)Won	15 May 2024	Amalgamated Metal Trading Limited (Applicant): Application AllowedThe advantage sought by AMT is found to be fair and reasonable in the circumstances, and that sufficient safeguards have been proposed.
3	Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute 22 Feb 2024 Rapyd Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	22 Feb 2024	Rapyd Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partParagraphs 22 and 36 of the SOC be struck out, with the exception of the communications stated at paragraph 22(a) of the SOC and as particularised in the Particulars.
4	Law Society v Chia Chwee Imm Helen: Disciplinary Procedures for Non-Practicing Solicitors 13 Jun 2021 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	13 Jun 2021	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Law Society's application for leave to investigate a complaint of misconduct against the Respondent was allowed.
5	CBP v CBS: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 30 Jan 2020 CBS (Defendant)Lost	30 Jan 2020	CBS (Defendant): Appeal LostArbitration award set aside.
6	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd v TT International Ltd: Assessment of Scheme Manager's Professional Fees 18 Oct 2018 nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2018	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed.