Chin Yen Bing Arthur

Chin Yen Bing Arthur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in service out of jurisdiction and appeals. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Yen Bing Arthur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chin Yen Bing Arthur has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore(Mar 2024) Micro Tellers v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance & Conspiracy(Sep 2023) Interactive Digital Finance Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Production of Documents under Rules of Court 2021(Jul 2023)
Covenant Chambers LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Zhang Hong En Jonathan v Private Trustee: Bankruptcy, Trustee's Sanction & Judicial Review(Dec 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chin Yen Bing Arthur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.6
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chin Yen Bing Arthur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore 04 Mar 2024 Luckin Coffee Inc (Applicant)Lost	04 Mar 2024	Luckin Coffee Inc (Applicant): Application for permission to appeal dismissedLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Micro Tellers v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance & Conspiracy 05 Sep 2023 Wong Zhi Kang Clement (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Sep 2023	Wong Zhi Kang Clement (Plaintiff): Application granted in partLeave to amend the writ to join Lee Moon Young as a party together with leave to make the amendments to the statement of claim relating to her joinder is granted. Leave to add the three new causes of action is refused.
3	Interactive Digital Finance Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Production of Documents under Rules of Court 2021 23 Jul 2023 Luckin Coffee Inc (Defendant)Neutral	23 Jul 2023	Luckin Coffee Inc (Defendant): Watching briefWatching brief. No specific outcome mentioned for this party. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Zhang Hong En Jonathan v Private Trustee: Bankruptcy, Trustee's Sanction & Judicial Review 01 Dec 2020 Zhang Hong En Jonathan (Applicant)Lost	01 Dec 2020	Zhang Hong En Jonathan (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application to reverse the Private Trustee's decision to revoke sanction for the Applicant to defend the third-party proceedings was dismissed.