Chiok Beng Piow Andy

Chiok Beng Piow Andy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in disciplinary proceedings and legal profession act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mutual Wills	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Moneylender	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chiok Beng Piow Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chiok Beng Piow Andy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Khoo & Partners	3 cases	60% of cases	Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Unlicensed Moneylending(Nov 2016) Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Solicitor Disciplinary Proceedings for Aiding Unlicensed Moneylending(Aug 2016) Low Geok Khim v Low Geok Bian: Presumption of Advancement in Joint Bank Accounts Dispute(Mar 2006)
AM Legal LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	VTL v VTM: Mutual Wills Dispute Over Mother's Estate(Aug 2021) Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chiok Beng Piow Andy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	60%
Neutral	116.0 parties avg	16.0	20%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	116.0 parties avg	16.0
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2021	23.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chiok Beng Piow Andy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	65,000.00	21,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VTL v VTM: Mutual Wills Dispute Over Mother's Estate 19 Aug 2021 VTN (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2021	VTN (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for an order that the 2017 Will was the last Will and testament of the Mother was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Boon Chuan (Respondent, Defendant)Won	04 May 2021	Ong Boon Chuan (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal in the amount of $65,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Unlicensed Moneylending 06 Nov 2016 LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent)Lost	06 Nov 2016	LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent): Suspended from practiceThe respondent was suspended from practice for two-and-a-half years. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Solicitor Disciplinary Proceedings for Aiding Unlicensed Moneylending 18 Aug 2016 LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent)Lost	18 Aug 2016	LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent): UnsuccessfulThe court found that due cause for disciplinary action against the Respondent has been shown inasmuch as all the charges preferred against her have been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
5	Low Geok Khim v Low Geok Bian: Presumption of Advancement in Joint Bank Accounts Dispute 09 Mar 2006 Low Chye Chim (Defendant)Neutral	09 Mar 2006	Low Chye Chim (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for this party is neutral as they are one of the defendants and the judgment was in favor of the first defendant.