Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal

Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in muslim law and family law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in muslim law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Muslim Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Charitable trusts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ancillary powers of court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Syariah Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wakaf	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A C Syed & Partners	3 cases	100% of cases	Safie bin Jantan v Zaiton binte Adom: Unjust Enrichment & Syariah Court Orders in Family Law(Feb 2023) Ahmad Kasim v Moona Esmail: Adverse Possession & Land Acquisition Act Dispute(Feb 2017) Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura v Saeed Salman: Wakaf, Muslim Law & Charitable Trusts(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.4 parties avg	3.4	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chishty Syed Ahmed Jamal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Safie bin Jantan v Zaiton binte Adom: Unjust Enrichment & Syariah Court Orders in Family Law 07 Feb 2023 Zaiton binte Adom (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	07 Feb 2023	Zaiton binte Adom (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $15,000 in costs to Nafsiah bte Wagiman (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ahmad Kasim v Moona Esmail: Adverse Possession & Land Acquisition Act Dispute 12 Feb 2017 Ahmad Kasim Bin Adam (Applicant)Lost	12 Feb 2017	Ahmad Kasim Bin Adam (Applicant): Claim DismissedThe applicant's claim for adverse possession and to set aside the land acquisition award was dismissed.
3	Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura v Saeed Salman: Wakaf, Muslim Law & Charitable Trusts 10 Jan 2016 Mohammed Salim Mautakif (Defendant)Lost	10 Jan 2016	Mohammed Salim Mautakif (Defendant): Orders in respect of accounting by the Defendants and for the delivery of financial statements and other recordsOrders in respect of accounting by the Defendants and for the delivery of financial statements and other records. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.