Chong Kee En

Chong Kee En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chong Kee En has demonstrated expertise across 56 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cumulative Scald Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Newton Hearing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempt to Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alteration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences relating to race	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Backdating of Sentence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chong Kee En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chong Kee En has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing(Mar 2023) Tangaraju s/o Suppiah v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application under CPC s 394H, Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2023) Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night(Jan 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chong Kee En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	22%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chong Kee En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Remanded	1(11%)	11%
Won	6(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Remanded: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing 30 Mar 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Mar 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
2	Tangaraju s/o Suppiah v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application under CPC s 394H, Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedCriminal motion dismissed summarily without setting it down for hearing.
3	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night 15 Jan 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 Jan 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonAccused found guilty on both charges.
4	PP v Azlin & Ridzuan: Murder Sentencing Appeal for Child Scalding Case 17 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	17 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part. Azlin was convicted of the alternative s 300(c) charge. Ridzuan's sentence was enhanced to life imprisonment, but the caning was removed.
5	Muhammad Alif v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Rape & Sexual Assault Sentencing Appeal 16 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
6	Public Prosecutor v. Muhammad Alif bin Ab Rahim: Rape and Sexual Assault Sentencing 11 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
7	Goh Chin Soon v Public Prosecutor: Leave to Refer Questions of Law on Amended Charges 10 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Remanded	10 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Retrial orderedCase remitted to the State Courts for a re-trial to be conducted in respect of the Passport.
8	Gobi a/l Avedian v Public Prosecutor: Review of MDA Conviction Based on Wilful Blindness 18 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially allowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially allowed as the conviction on the capital charge was set aside, but the conviction on the amended charge was reinstated.
9	Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & Provocation 13 Feb 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Feb 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of the AccusedThe Accused was convicted on the charge of attempted murder.