Chong Pik Wah

Chong Pik Wah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and damages assessment. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chong Pik Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chong Pik Wah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Thomas & Leong	2 cases	40% of cases	Chua Peng Ho v Saravanan: Discontinuance of Suit Under Order 21 Rule 2(6) of the Rules of Court(May 2017) Siew Pick Chiang v Hyundai: Damages Assessment for PTSD from Negligence(Nov 2016)
Lim Kia Tong and Partners	2 cases	40% of cases	Lee Teck Nam v Kang Hock Seng Paul: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury(Jul 2005) Yip Jenn Yeuan v Ng Ah Chen: Contract Claim Arising from Road Accident Negligence(Jan 2005)
Lim Kia Tong & Pnrs	1 cases	20% of cases	Kang Hock Seng Paul v Lee Teck Nam: Negligence, Road Accident, and Contributory Negligence(Dec 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chong Pik Wah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chong Pik Wah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,645,306.96	2,881,768.993 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chua Peng Ho v Saravanan: Discontinuance of Suit Under Order 21 Rule 2(6) of the Rules of Court 02 May 2017 Saravanan A/L Subramaniam (Respondent)Neutral	02 May 2017	Saravanan A/L Subramaniam (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Siew Pick Chiang v Hyundai: Damages Assessment for PTSD from Negligence 30 Nov 2016 Siew Pick Chiang (Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2016	Siew Pick Chiang (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $8,645,306.96 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lee Teck Nam v Kang Hock Seng Paul: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 28 Jul 2005 Lee Teck Nam (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jul 2005	Lee Teck Nam (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with adjustments to damages awarded.
4	Yip Jenn Yeuan v Ng Ah Chen: Contract Claim Arising from Road Accident Negligence 30 Jan 2005 Ng Ah Chen (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2005	Ng Ah Chen (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs to follow the event (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Kang Hock Seng Paul v Lee Teck Nam: Negligence, Road Accident, and Contributory Negligence 16 Dec 2002 Kang Hock Seng Paul (Plaintiff)Won	16 Dec 2002	Kang Hock Seng Paul (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; monetary amount not specified in the judgment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).