Choo Si Sen

Choo Si Sen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and culpable homicide. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choo Si Sen has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
National Service Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Si Sen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choo Si Sen has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Standing of Unincorporated Association to Sue(May 2016) Seow Wei Sin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Enlistment Act Offence(Oct 2010)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	20% of cases	Thong Sing Hock v PP: Revision of Proceedings & Sentencing for Immigration Officer's Offences(Mar 2009)
Tan Lee & Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Xavier Yap: Culpable Homicide, Mentally Disordered Offenders, Sentencing(Aug 2023)
Choo and Lim LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Low Ah Soy: Culpable Homicide and Mischief Sentencing(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choo Si Sen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choo Si Sen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Xavier Yap: Culpable Homicide, Mentally Disordered Offenders, Sentencing 14 Aug 2023 Xavier Yap Jung Houn (Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2023	Xavier Yap Jung Houn (Defendant): Sentenced to imprisonment
2	Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple: Standing of Unincorporated Association to Sue 23 May 2016 Chee Hock Keng (Appellant)Lost	23 May 2016	Chee Hock Keng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Seow Wei Sin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Enlistment Act Offence 24 Oct 2010 Seow Wei Sin (Appellant, Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2010	Seow Wei Sin (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe 18 months’ imprisonment term was substituted with a fine of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Thong Sing Hock v PP: Revision of Proceedings & Sentencing for Immigration Officer's Offences 01 Mar 2009 Thong Sing Hock (Appellant)Lost	01 Mar 2009	Thong Sing Hock (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence EnhancedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed, and his sentence was enhanced from 24 months to 33 months.
5	Public Prosecutor v Low Ah Soy: Culpable Homicide and Mischief Sentencing 04 Nov 2004 Low Ah Soy (Defendant)Lost	04 Nov 2004	Low Ah Soy (Defendant): Sentence of four years’ imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.