Choo Tse Yun

Choo Tse Yun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and maintenance. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Tse Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choo Tse Yun has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	PP v Goldring: Common Law Right of Access to Seized Documents & Criminal Case Disclosure(Nov 2013) Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights(Apr 2013) PP v Ang Seng Thor: Corruption Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act, Corporate Governance(May 2011)
Drew & Napier LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	ARX v ARY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings(Feb 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choo Tse Yun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	23.8 parties avg	3.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.8 parties avg	3.8
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choo Tse Yun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	50,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ARX v ARY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings 26 Feb 2015 ARX (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Feb 2015	ARX (Plaintiff): PartialCross-appealed against part of the decision relating to the division of the matrimonial assets and maintenance. The court ordered that the parties try to distribute the matrimonial assets as of 30 June 2012 in such a manner that the defendant receives 50% of the asset pool valued at $1,476,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PP v Goldring: Common Law Right of Access to Seized Documents & Criminal Case Disclosure 07 Nov 2013 Goldring, Timothy Nicholas (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2013	Goldring, Timothy Nicholas (Respondent): WonThe Court of Appeal answered the six questions referred by the Public Prosecutor, affirming the existence of a common law right of access to seized documents.
3	Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights 24 Apr 2013 John Andrew Nordmann (Applicant)Won	24 Apr 2013	John Andrew Nordmann (Applicant): Application AllowedThe applicant's request for criminal revision was allowed.
4	PP v Ang Seng Thor: Corruption Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act, Corporate Governance 25 May 2011 Ang Seng Thor (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2011	Ang Seng Thor (Respondent): Sentence VariedThe sentence was varied to a term of six weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $25,000 per charge, with both imprisonment terms to run consecutively. The total sentence was therefore 12 weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $50,000 (SGD, assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore).