Choo Zheng Xi

Choo Zheng Xi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 47 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and contempt of court. Their track record shows a 28.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 26% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated expertise across 122 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	20 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 20 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	15 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	13 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied term of mutual trust and confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Environmental Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tort of conspiracy to injure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-solicitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Protection from Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Priority of Creditors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Procedures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Springboard injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Buyout	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good Faith and Fidelity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Priorities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infectious Diseases Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Courts and Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False statements of fact	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privacy Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Zheng Xi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choo Zheng Xi has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Low & Choo LLC	20 cases	43% of cases	Urip Cahyadi v. Henry Surya: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute(Apr 2022) Ong Chai Soon v Ong Chai Koon: Constructive Trusts & Housing Development Act Interpretation(Apr 2022) Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022)
Peter Low LLC	17 cases	36% of cases	Ng Chye Huay v Public Prosecutor: Vandalism Act & Freedom of Expression(Sep 2017) PP v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act & Rosewood Import(May 2017) Public Prosecutor v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act Import Violation(Mar 2017)
Remy Choo Chambers LLC	6 cases	13% of cases	Cradle Wealth Solutions v MTN Consultants: Enforcing Settlement Agreement & Sham Defense(Oct 2023) Parastate Labs Inc v. Wang Li: Appeal on Quantum of Mareva Injunction for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Sep 2023) Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Procedure - Default Sentence and Set-Off(Aug 2023)
RCL Chambers Law Corporation	4 cases	9% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Xu Yuanchen: Default Imprisonment Term and Appeal(Oct 2024) Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Defamation, and Freedom of Expression(May 2024) Neo Chin Heng v Good Year Contractor: Contempt of Court for Failure to Produce Company Documents(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choo Zheng Xi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 12 (26%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Lost	293.2 parties avg	3.2	62%
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	9%
Won	133.3 parties avg	3.3	28%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	63.7 parties avg	3.7
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	73.4 parties avg	3.4
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	62.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2023	63.8 parties avg	3.8
2024	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choo Zheng Xi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	29(62%)	62%
Partial	4(9%)	9%
Won	13(28%)	28%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,801,545.45	90,077.2720 cases	20
USD	11,500,000.00	3,833,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	6 411	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	7 151	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 5 cases (71.4%) Won: 1 cases (14.3%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	6 312	Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2020	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2023	6 213	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2024	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 47 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Xu Yuanchen: Default Imprisonment Term and Appeal 28 Oct 2024 Xu Yuanchen (Respondent)Lost	28 Oct 2024	Xu Yuanchen (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the respondent's appeal against sentence in the General Division of the High Court and set aside the fine of $8,000 (in default two weeks imprisonment) imposed by the Judge.
2	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Defamation, and Freedom of Expression 19 May 2024 Xu Yuanchen (Applicant)Lost	19 May 2024	Xu Yuanchen (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for criminal reference was dismissed.
3	Neo Chin Heng v Good Year Contractor: Contempt of Court for Failure to Produce Company Documents 06 Mar 2024 Neo Chin Heng (Claimant, Applicant)Won	06 Mar 2024	Neo Chin Heng (Claimant, Applicant): Successful Committal ApplicationThe committal application was successful; the respondents were found guilty of contempt of court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Neo Chin Heng v Good Year Contractor: Application for Committal Order for Contempt of Court 11 Jan 2024 Neo Chin Heng (Claimant, Committal Applicant)Won	11 Jan 2024	Neo Chin Heng (Claimant, Committal Applicant): Application grantedThe applicant's application for permission to apply for committal orders against the respondents was granted. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Cradle Wealth Solutions v MTN Consultants: Enforcing Settlement Agreement & Sham Defense 26 Oct 2023 Cradle Wealth Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Oct 2023	Cradle Wealth Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDefendants are ordered to pay Cradle Wealth the sum of US$4,000,000.00 plus pre- and post-judgment interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ (ie, 24 August 2020), with costs to be agreed or taxed.
6	Parastate Labs Inc v. Wang Li: Appeal on Quantum of Mareva Injunction for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 24 Sep 2023 Wang Li (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	24 Sep 2023	Wang Li (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; injunction granted shall cover assets of up to US$5 million.
7	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Procedure - Default Sentence and Set-Off 03 Aug 2023 Xu Yuanchen (Appellant)Won	03 Aug 2023	Xu Yuanchen (Appellant): Appeal AllowedPreviously served sentence should be treated as going towards the default sentence imposed on the appellant, and thus nothing remains to be served or paid under the sentence.
8	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Mareva Injunction Quantum Dispute 25 May 2023 Wang Li (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2023	Wang Li (Defendant): Injunction granted against defendant for a reduced amountMareva injunction granted against the defendant, but for a reduced amount of US$2.5 million instead of US$5 million.
9	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Computer Misuse Act 03 May 2023 Xu Yuanchen (Appellant)Partial	03 May 2023	Xu Yuanchen (Appellant): Appeal against sentence for criminal defamation charges allowedSentence of imprisonment set aside and substituted by a fine of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 27 Feb 2023 Wang Li (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2023	Wang Li (Defendant): Case management stay grantedCase management stay of the action was granted pending the resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
11	Urip Cahyadi v. Henry Surya: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute 28 Apr 2022 Henry Surya (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2022	Henry Surya (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
12	Ong Chai Soon v Ong Chai Koon: Constructive Trusts & Housing Development Act Interpretation 21 Apr 2022 Ong Chai Soon (Appellant)Lost	21 Apr 2022	Ong Chai Soon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $50,000 to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
14	Dong Wei v Shell Eastern Trading: Breach of Employment Contract & Tort Claims 23 Feb 2022 Dong Wei (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Feb 2022	Dong Wei (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety. Costs of $50,000 inclusive of disbursements were awarded to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Dong Wei v Shell Eastern Trading: Breach of Contract, Negligence, Conspiracy, Malicious Falsehood 26 May 2021 Dong Wei (Plaintiff)Lost	26 May 2021	Dong Wei (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims against both defendants were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions for Disclosure of Statements 17 Mar 2021 Xu Yuanchen (Applicant)Lost	17 Mar 2021	Xu Yuanchen (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for production of statements was dismissed.
17	Quek Jin Oon v Goh Chin Soon: Summary Judgment & Mareva Injunction in Bills of Exchange Dispute 09 Nov 2020 Goh Chin Soon (Defendant)Partial	09 Nov 2020	Goh Chin Soon (Defendant): Leave to defend granted conditionallyLeave to defend granted for the remaining S$500,000 conditional on security. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Singapore Air Charter v Peter Low & Choo LLC: Priority of Judgment Creditors in Property Sale 13 Oct 2020 Peter Low & Choo LLC (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2020	Peter Low & Choo LLC (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Peter Low & Choo LLC to receive $50,000 inclusive of disbursements from Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Kho Long Huat v Jian Rong Engineering: Share Buyout Dispute in Company Winding Up 25 Aug 2020 Jian Rong Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2020	Jian Rong Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to set aside the Consent Order dismissed; Share Buyout ordered on terms determined by the court.Application to set aside the Consent Order dismissed; Share Buyout ordered on terms determined by the court. Costs of $15,000 awarded to Kho Long Huat, to be personally borne by Wang and Zhao (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails 29 Mar 2020 Choong Chee Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Choong Chee Hong (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to declare s 377A unconstitutional was dismissed.
21	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Expression 15 Mar 2020 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	15 Mar 2020	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Cease-publication injunction granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Hoo Su Hen v Sim Mao Sheng Desmond: Striking Out Pleadings in Negligence and Misrepresentation Claim 15 Aug 2019 Sim Mao Sheng Desmond (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Aug 2019	Sim Mao Sheng Desmond (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe first defendant's appeal against the dismissal of his application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
23	GCP v Public Prosecutor: Infectious Diseases Act & HIV Transmission Sentencing 25 Jun 2019 GCP (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	25 Jun 2019	GCP (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
24	Attorney-General v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Contempt of Court Sentencing 28 Apr 2019 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2019	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent): Fine imposedFine of SGD 5,000 imposed, with one week’s imprisonment in default. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	HT SRL v Wee Shuo Woon: Breach of Contract, Illegality, Public Policy, Restraint of Trade, Employee's Duty of Good Faith 17 Apr 2019 Wee Shuo Woon (Defendant)Partial	17 Apr 2019	Wee Shuo Woon (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim allowed for unpaid salary ($23,545.45) and expenses ($345.47) with employer's CPF contribution ($1,700.00) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Kong Hoo v Public Prosecutor: Interpreting 'In Transit' under the Endangered Species Act 07 Apr 2019 Wong Wee Keong (Applicant)Won	07 Apr 2019	Wong Wee Keong (Applicant): Appeal AllowedConviction quashed and sentence set aside.
27	Peter Low & Choo LLC v Singapore Air Charter: Priority of Writs of Seizure and Sale under Land Titles Act 01 Apr 2019 Peter Low & Choo LLC (Applicant)Won	01 Apr 2019	Peter Low & Choo LLC (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe applicant is entitled to Danial Patrick Higgins’ interest in the Surplus Proceeds from the sale of the Property in priority over the first respondent.
28	AG v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Freedom of Speech & Contempt of Court 08 Oct 2018 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent)Lost	08 Oct 2018	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Respondent): ConvictedConvicted for scandalising contempt under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016.
29	Peter Low LLC v Higgins: Ex Parte Order, Stare Decisis & Joint Tenancy Interest 12 Nov 2017 Peter Low LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Nov 2017	Peter Low LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application for an order that the Defendant’s interest in an immovable property be attached and taken in execution under a writ of seizure and sale was dismissed.
30	Ng Chye Huay v Public Prosecutor: Vandalism Act & Freedom of Expression 13 Sep 2017 Ng Chye Huay (Appellant)Lost	13 Sep 2017	Ng Chye Huay (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
31	Almega Investments v Chiang Sing Jeong: Breach of Contract & Implied Terms Dispute 14 Aug 2017 Lim Chong Poon (Plaintiff)Dismissed	14 Aug 2017	Lim Chong Poon (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed.
32	PP v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act & Rosewood Import 25 May 2017 Wong Wee Keong (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2017	Wong Wee Keong (Respondent): Imprisonment and FineWong Wee Keong was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment and a fine of $500,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Public Prosecutor v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act Import Violation 29 Mar 2017 Wong Wee Keong (Respondent)Lost	29 Mar 2017	Wong Wee Keong (Respondent): ConvictedThe respondent was convicted of the charges.
34	Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng: Harassment & False Statements under Protection from Harassment Act 15 Jan 2017 Ting Choon Meng (Respondent, Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2017	Ting Choon Meng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed.The appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance: Derivative Action, Director Conflict of Interest 10 Jan 2017 GOH YAM SIM (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	10 Jan 2017	GOH YAM SIM (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal LostAppeal lost. The court ordered that JL and Goh were to pay costs of $15,000 each to the Appellant (inclusive of reasonable disbursements), with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	PP v Wong Wee Keong: Endangered Species Act & Illegal Rosewood Import 04 May 2016 Kong Hoo Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 May 2016	Kong Hoo Pte Ltd (Respondent): Acquittal Set AsideThe acquittal was set aside, and the case was remitted to the District Judge for the defence to be called.
37	Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance Management: Derivative Action & Shareholder Rights 22 Feb 2016 GOH YAM SIM (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2016	GOH YAM SIM (Defendant): WonDefendant was awarded costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Police Warnings 21 Dec 2015 Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Applicant)Lost	21 Dec 2015	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Applicant): Application dismissedThe court dismissed Mr. Wham's application for judicial review.
39	Ting Choon Meng v Attorney-General: Protection from Harassment Act & False Statements 08 Dec 2015 Ting Choon Meng (Appellant)Won	08 Dec 2015	Ting Choon Meng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the decision of the District Judge was allowed.
40	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Scandalising the Court & Freedom of Speech 29 Nov 2015 Au Wai Pang (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2015	Au Wai Pang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The appellant was originally fined $8,000 in the High Court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Sim Chay Koon v NTUC Income: Upholding Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes 19 Aug 2015 LIM KIA MENG (Appellant)Lost	19 Aug 2015	LIM KIA MENG (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection 02 Aug 2015 Employee Defendants (Defendant)Partial	02 Aug 2015	Employee Defendants (Defendant): Application Dismissed in Part, Injunction Granted in PartApplication for 'springboard' injunctions dismissed, but interim injunction granted to not disclose confidential information belonging to the plaintiff and another interim injunction to restrain them from soliciting or inducing other employees from the plaintiff to leave the plaintiff.
43	Attorney-General v Au Wai Pang: Scandalising Contempt and Freedom of Speech 20 Jan 2015 Au Wai Pang (Respondent)Lost	20 Jan 2015	Au Wai Pang (Respondent): Guilty of scandalising contempt in respect of the First ArticleThe Respondent was found guilty of scandalising contempt in respect of the First Article.
44	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages 06 Aug 2014 Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard (Appellant)Lost	06 Aug 2014	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant's claim for damages beyond the contractual notice period was legally unsustainable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Court of Appeal Jurisdiction 29 Apr 2014 Au Wai Pang (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2014	Au Wai Pang (Respondent): Application AllowedThe application by the Attorney-General for leave to commence committal proceedings against Au Wai Pang was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	Tan Kim Hock Anthony v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust Appeal 20 Feb 2014 Tan Kim Hock Anthony (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	20 Feb 2014	Tan Kim Hock Anthony (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
47	BMP v BMQ: Contempt of Court for Breach of Mareva Injunction 04 Dec 2013 BMP (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	04 Dec 2013	BMP (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.