Chow Jia Yao

Chow Jia Yao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction adjudication and construction law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chow Jia Yao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chow Jia Yao has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Audi Construction v. Kian Hiap Construction: Security of Payment Act & Validity of Payment Claims(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chow Jia Yao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chow Jia Yao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Audi Construction v. Kian Hiap Construction: Security of Payment Act & Validity of Payment Claims 21 Jan 2018 Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Jan 2018	Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).