Chow Jian Hong

Chow Jian Hong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and trademarks. Their track record shows a 56.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade names	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Registration criteria	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distinctiveness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Therapeutic Products Regulation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Priority	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Industrial application	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflicts with earlier marks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Well Known Trade Marks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Groundless threats of infringement proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chow Jian Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chow Jian Hong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & Injunctions(Apr 2019) Novartis v Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patent Register Rectification(Dec 2017) SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd v Strait Colonies Pte Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Lease Agreement(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chow Jian Hong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chow Jian Hong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	5(56%)	56%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	92,348.70	13,192.677 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2017	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & Injunctions 29 Apr 2019 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	29 Apr 2019	Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partCivil Appeal No 79 of 2018 allowed and costs awarded to the Appellant at $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). The costs order of $5,000 awarded to the Respondent for the striking out application is reversed so that the same amount is now payable to the Appellant. The costs order of $7,000 awarded to the Respondent for the application for an injunction is varied by reducing the amount payable to the Respondent to $3,500.
2	Novartis v Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patent Register Rectification 19 Dec 2017 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	19 Dec 2017	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedNovartis's application for rectification of the patent register was allowed.
3	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd v Strait Colonies Pte Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Lease Agreement 02 Oct 2017 Strait Colonies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Oct 2017	Strait Colonies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $5,000 awarded on counterclaim for misrepresentation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty 31 Jul 2017 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	31 Jul 2017	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed, including the costs of and incidental to the application for leave to appeal.
5	Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark 25 Apr 2017 CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent)Lost	25 Apr 2017	CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Respondent’s CAESARSTONE Mark shall not proceed to registration. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant its disbursements and half its costs here and below. For the avoidance of doubt, the latter includes the costs of: (a) this appeal; (b) the hearing before the Judge and; (c) the hearing before the PAR. The costs and disbursements are to be taxed if not agreed. We also make the usual consequential order for the payment out of the security. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd: Commission Dispute in Employment Contract 06 Oct 2016 Stratech Systems Limited (Defendant)Lost	06 Oct 2016	Stratech Systems Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the remainder of $62,348.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute 25 May 2016 Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 May 2016	Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's application to amend the patent was dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd v Ceramiche Caesar SpA: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark 28 Mar 2016 CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Appellant)Won	28 Mar 2016	CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; CAESARSTONE Mark is allowed to proceed to registration in Class 19.
9	Polo/Lauren Co LP v United States Polo Association: Trade Mark Dispute over Polo Player Device 07 Mar 2016 United States Polo Association (Defendant, Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2016	United States Polo Association (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.