Christine M Chan

Christine M Chan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christine M Chan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Time charterparties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Time limitation of guarantor's liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine M Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christine M Chan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	100% of cases	Chua Lam v Peh Kwee Tee: Interpretation of Consent Order for Batam Project Transfer(Mar 2001) AS Nordlandsbanken v Nederkoorn: Guarantee, Time Charterparty Breach & Damages Assessment(Dec 2000) LKM Investment v Cathay Theatres: Restraining Winding Up Petition Based on Statutory Demand Validity & Abuse of Process(Jan 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christine M Chan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christine M Chan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,301,856.70	1,301,856.701 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chua Lam v Peh Kwee Tee: Interpretation of Consent Order for Batam Project Transfer 21 Mar 2001 Peh Kwee Tee (Defendant)Neutral	21 Mar 2001	Peh Kwee Tee (Defendant): Orders made directing both parties to take specific actions to facilitate the transfer of assetsOrders made directing both parties to take specific actions to facilitate the transfer of assets as per the consent order.
2	AS Nordlandsbanken v Nederkoorn: Guarantee, Time Charterparty Breach & Damages Assessment 13 Dec 2000 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (London Branch) (Plaintiff)Won	13 Dec 2000	Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (London Branch) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $650,928.35 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	LKM Investment v Cathay Theatres: Restraining Winding Up Petition Based on Statutory Demand Validity & Abuse of Process 20 Jan 2000 LKM Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jan 2000	LKM Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedThe court allowed LKM's application, restraining Cathay from presenting a winding up petition based on the statutory demand.