Christine Tan

Christine Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christine Tan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and child support.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christine Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	BHN v BHO: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christine Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christine Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BHN v BHO: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 28 Apr 2013 BHO (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2013	BHO (Defendant): Retained larger share of matrimonial propertyDefendant was awarded 60% share of the matrimonial property, which was upheld on appeal.