Christine Tee

Christine Tee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christine Tee has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hospital Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christine Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christine Tee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Choy Chee Yean v Law Society of Singapore: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors(Nov 2019) Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice(May 2017) Jeganathan Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Criminal Breach of Trust(Oct 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christine Tee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christine Tee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Choy Chee Yean v Law Society of Singapore: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 18 Nov 2019 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	18 Nov 2019	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for reinstatement to the Roll of advocates and solicitors allowed, subject to conditions.
2	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice 11 May 2017 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent)Won	11 May 2017	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Jeganathan Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Criminal Breach of Trust 19 Oct 2016 Jeganathan Ramasamy (Appellant)Won	19 Oct 2016	Jeganathan Ramasamy (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal against conviction allowed, and the appellant is acquitted and discharged.
4	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test 21 Feb 2016 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2016	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the first defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
5	Yip Man Hing Kevin v Gleneagles Hospital: Judicial Review of Hospital's Disciplinary Decision 23 Jan 2014 Yip Man Hing Kevin (Applicant)Lost	23 Jan 2014	Yip Man Hing Kevin (Applicant): Application for leave dismissedApplication for leave to apply for a quashing order was dismissed. Costs were ordered to be paid to the respondent and the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).