Chua Kok Wah

Chua Kok Wah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chua Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chua Kok Wah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Consorcio MGT v Owner of MIN RUI: Admiralty Claim for Damaged Steel Structures(Sep 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chua Kok Wah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chua Kok Wah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Consorcio MGT v Owner of MIN RUI: Admiralty Claim for Damaged Steel Structures 01 Sep 2016 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “MIN RUI” (Defendant)Won	01 Sep 2016	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “MIN RUI” (Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; security provided by the defendant to be returned and plaintiffs ordered to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).