Chung Ping Shen

Chung Ping Shen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hire Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Secret Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ping Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chung Ping Shen has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
H.A. & Chung Partnership	2 cases	33% of cases	Orix Leasing v. Koh Mui Hoe: Conversion of Printing Machine(Nov 2008) Orix Leasing v Koh Mui Hoe: Conversion Claim over Printing Machine(Nov 2008)
H A and Chung Partnership	2 cases	33% of cases	Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal(Jan 2006) Lin Bin v PP: Illegal Employment of Immigration Offender under Immigration Act(Nov 2005)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia(Aug 2005)
H A & Chung Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Secret Trusts & Estate Distribution Dispute(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chung Ping Shen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Lost	54.6 parties avg	4.6	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chung Ping Shen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,200,000.00	400,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orix Leasing v. Koh Mui Hoe: Conversion of Printing Machine 16 Nov 2008 Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Nov 2008	Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd in the sum of $600,000 with interest thereon at the court rate from the date of the writ and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Orix Leasing v Koh Mui Hoe: Conversion Claim over Printing Machine 16 Nov 2008 Kenzone Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	16 Nov 2008	Kenzone Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the third defendant was discontinued at an early stage of the trial.
3	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Secret Trusts & Estate Distribution Dispute 21 Nov 2007 Nicholas Ng Puay Guan (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Nov 2007	Nicholas Ng Puay Guan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for $100,000 dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal 24 Jan 2006 Took Leng How (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2006	Took Leng How (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
5	Lin Bin v PP: Illegal Employment of Immigration Offender under Immigration Act 10 Nov 2005 Lin Bin (Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2005	Lin Bin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction was dismissed.
6	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia 25 Aug 2005 Took Leng How (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2005	Took Leng How (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAccused found guilty as charged and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.