Chung Ting Fai

Chung Ting Fai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated expertise across 65 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint bank accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Priority of Creditors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Condition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chung Ting Fai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chung Ting Fai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chung Ting Fai & Co	14 cases	88% of cases	WWI v WWJ: Testamentary Capacity, Mental Disability & Will Revocation Dispute(Aug 2024) Khoo v Khoo: Resulting Trusts & Survivorship in Joint Accounts Dispute(Oct 2023) Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Computer Misuse Act(May 2023)
Chung Tan and Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Chiong Chin May Selena: Show Cause Action for Solicitor's Misconduct(Aug 2005)
Chung Tan & Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Cheung Kan Lam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Housebreaking with Intent to Commit Theft(Feb 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chung Ting Fai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	132.8 parties avg	2.8	81%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	6%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2023	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chung Ting Fai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(81%)	81%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	2(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	370,000.00	123,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WWI v WWJ: Testamentary Capacity, Mental Disability & Will Revocation Dispute 05 Aug 2024 WWJ (Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2024	WWJ (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; respondent to bear his own costs.
2	Khoo v Khoo: Resulting Trusts & Survivorship in Joint Accounts Dispute 30 Oct 2023 Khoo Phaik Lian Joyce (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	30 Oct 2023	Khoo Phaik Lian Joyce (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim Allowed in PartDeclaration that the Defendants hold the balance of the moneys in the Joint Accounts as at the date of Dr Khoo’s death on trust for Dr Khoo’s Estate and the beneficiaries in the Will and Codicil.
3	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Computer Misuse Act 03 May 2023 Daniel De Costa Augustin (Appellant)Lost	03 May 2023	Daniel De Costa Augustin (Appellant): Appeal against conviction with respect to all charges dismissedAppeal against conviction with respect to all charges dismissed
4	Yiong Kok Kong v Liu Chien Min: Sale of Property Under Court Order & Priority of Creditors in Bankruptcy 28 Nov 2022 Liu Chien Min (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2022	Liu Chien Min (Defendant): Order for sale of property grantedThe court granted the order for the sale of the property, against the defendant's wishes. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Zhong Lingyun v Yuan Fang: Breach of Settlement Agreement Dispute 11 Apr 2022 Zhong Lingyun (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2022	Zhong Lingyun (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $350,000.00, with interest to be calculated based on the statutory default rate, from the date of this judgment until the date of full payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	PP v Kishor Kumar & Pung Ah Kiang: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Admissibility of Statements 03 Feb 2022 Pung Ah Kiang (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2022	Pung Ah Kiang (Defendant): ConvictedPung was convicted of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jun 2021 Mohamed Affandi bin Mohamed Yuz Al-Haj (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2021	Mohamed Affandi bin Mohamed Yuz Al-Haj (Defendant): Sentence of 28 years’ imprisonmentThe defendant was sentenced to 28 years’ imprisonment for conspiracy to traffic diamorphine.
8	Public Prosecutor v Oh Yew Lee: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Aug 2019 Oh Yew Lee (Defendant)Lost	26 Aug 2019	Oh Yew Lee (Defendant): Conviction and mandatory death penalty imposedThe accused was convicted and the mandatory death penalty was imposed.
9	Public Prosecutor v Fauzi Bin Sanusi: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Aug 2018 Fauzi Bin Sanusi (Defendant)Lost	05 Aug 2018	Fauzi Bin Sanusi (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of importing diamorphine into Singapore and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
10	PP v Ong Seow Ping & Abdul Rahim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Apr 2018 Ong Seow Ping (Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2018	Ong Seow Ping (Defendant): ConvictedOng Seow Ping was convicted on the amended charge of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
11	Roslan Bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Abnormality of Mind 12 Nov 2017 Pausi bin Jefridin (Applicant)Lost	12 Nov 2017	Pausi bin Jefridin (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for re-sentencing dismissed.
12	Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 01 Mar 2015 Jiang Huaguo (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	01 Mar 2015	Jiang Huaguo (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal regarding care and control of the child and division of matrimonial home was dismissed. The defendant is required to pay a lump sum of $20,000 for the plaintiff's maintenance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine 21 Apr 2010 Roslan bin Bakar (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Roslan bin Bakar (Defendant): Guilty as chargedRoslan was found guilty as charged.
14	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation 09 Mar 2010 Ahmad Suhaimi bin Ismail (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Ahmad Suhaimi bin Ismail (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane.
15	Law Society of Singapore v Chiong Chin May Selena: Show Cause Action for Solicitor's Misconduct 17 Aug 2005 Chiong Chin May Selena (Respondent)Lost	17 Aug 2005	Chiong Chin May Selena (Respondent): Suspended from practiceRespondent suspended from practice for one year and undertook not to resume practice as a sole proprietor without leave of court.
16	Cheung Kan Lam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Housebreaking with Intent to Commit Theft 17 Feb 2003 Cheung Kan Lam (Appellant)Lost	17 Feb 2003	Cheung Kan Lam (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.