Cindy Lim

Cindy Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and care and control.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cindy Lim has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
On-demand Bonds	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Applicable Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cindy Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cindy Lim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Shanghai Electric v PT Merak: Restraining Call on On-Demand Bond under English Law(Jan 2010)
RHT Law Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute under Women's Charter(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cindy Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cindy Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute under Women's Charter 27 Jan 2013 BCC (Respondent)Partial	27 Jan 2013	BCC (Respondent): Appeal denied in partAppeal dismissed with regard to the issue relating to care and control of the children, and allowed with regard to the issue relating to the division of matrimonial assets. The net sale proceeds from the Properties be divided in the proportion of 40% to the Husband and 60% to the Wife instead. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shanghai Electric v PT Merak: Restraining Call on On-Demand Bond under English Law 05 Jan 2010 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jan 2010	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for injunction dismissed.