Cindy Quek

Cindy Quek is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and patent infringement. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cindy Quek has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prior Art	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Revocation of patent	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cindy Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cindy Quek has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	2 cases	67% of cases	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process(Apr 2007) Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case(Oct 2006)
Shook Lin and Bok	1 cases	33% of cases	Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cindy Quek's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cindy Quek's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process 11 Apr 2007 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2007	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd.
2	Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case 09 Oct 2006 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	09 Oct 2006	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Respondent): Remitted to Trial JudgeCase remitted to the trial judge to consider the new evidence.
3	Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing 26 Jan 2006 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jan 2006	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; an injunction is granted to restrain Mariwu from infringing the patent, and there will be an inquiry as to the damages suffered by Dextra as a result of the infringement. Dextra is entitled to the costs of the action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.