Claire Tan

Claire Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and judicial management. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Claire Tan has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Claire Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Claire Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process(Oct 2023) Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022)
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Sep 2016) UOB v Lippo Marina: Attribution of Fraudulent Employee Knowledge & Summary Determination of Law(Feb 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Claire Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.2
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.7 parties avg	6.7	50%
Partial	113.0 parties avg	13.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	26.3 parties avg	6.3
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Claire Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cachet Multi Strategy Fund SPC v Feng Shi: Striking Out Claims & Abuse of Process 12 Oct 2023 Alex SK Liu (Defendant)Lost	12 Oct 2023	Alex SK Liu (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant lost the application to strike out the claims. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant)Partial	13 Mar 2022	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant): PartialThe court held that the judicial management expenses principle generally did not apply to the claims arising out of the vessels that were the subject of SUM 2085, subject to certain exceptions. Costs were awarded to Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Swee Wan v Lian Tian Yong Johnny: Striking Out Pleadings in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 27 Sep 2016 Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Sep 2016	Johnny Lian Tian Yong (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	UOB v Lippo Marina: Attribution of Fraudulent Employee Knowledge & Summary Determination of Law 21 Feb 2016 Aurellia Adrianus Ho also known as Filly Ho (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	21 Feb 2016	Aurellia Adrianus Ho also known as Filly Ho (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; both applications (determination of law and striking out) granted. Costs of $5,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).