Clarence Ding Si-Liang

Clarence Ding Si-Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in inducement of breach of contract and contempt of court. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and restraint of trade.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restrictive covenants	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforceability of restraint of trade clauses	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Applicable test for interlocutory injunctions giving effect to restraint of trade clauses	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Clarence Ding Si-Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clarence Ding Si-Liang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	Shopee Singapore v. Lim Teck Yong: Enforceability of Restraint of Trade Clauses in Employment Contract(Jan 2024) Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade Injunction(Dec 2021)
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	iVenture Card v Big Bus: Breach of Contract, Inducement, Conspiracy & Damages in Tourism Pass Dispute(May 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clarence Ding Si-Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	100%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clarence Ding Si-Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	26,778.32	13,389.162 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shopee Singapore v. Lim Teck Yong: Enforceability of Restraint of Trade Clauses in Employment Contract 30 Jan 2024 Shopee Singapore Private Limited (Claimant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	Shopee Singapore Private Limited (Claimant): Application dismissedShopee's application for an interim injunction was dismissed.
2	Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade Injunction 02 Dec 2021 Rohrlach, Nicolas Robert Adam (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Dec 2021	Rohrlach, Nicolas Robert Adam (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedPlaintiff to pay a fine of S$25,000 within two weeks, with a term of one week’s imprisonment in default of payment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	iVenture Card v Big Bus: Breach of Contract, Inducement, Conspiracy & Damages in Tourism Pass Dispute 25 May 2020 iVenture Card Travel Ltd (Defendant in Counterclaim)Dismissed	25 May 2020	iVenture Card Travel Ltd (Defendant in Counterclaim): DismissediVenture Travel’s counterclaim against Big Bus for repudiation of the said agreement dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).