Clarence Tan

Clarence Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and strata title law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clarence Tan has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and collective sales.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clarence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clarence Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	DBS Vickers v Chin Pang Joo: Agent's Authority & Trading Losses(Nov 2009) Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution(Dec 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clarence Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clarence Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	863,440.90	431,720.452 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DBS Vickers v Chin Pang Joo: Agent's Authority & Trading Losses 01 Nov 2009 Chin Pang Joo (Defendant)Lost	01 Nov 2009	Chin Pang Joo (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the first defendant for S$775,124.97 and interest as of 28 October 2009 of S$88,315.93. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution 12 Dec 2007 Dynamic Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 Dec 2007	Dynamic Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.