Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming

Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and sentencing. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Animal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Sabrina Sim v Public Prosecutor: Animal Abuse, Disqualification Order Appeal(Sep 2022) Bhavin Rashmi Mehta v Chetan Mehta: Director Resignation & Company Law(Jul 2022) CPU v CPX: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Incapacity(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.8 parties avg	3.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	33.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clement Julien Tan Tze Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sabrina Sim v Public Prosecutor: Animal Abuse, Disqualification Order Appeal 26 Sep 2022 Sabrina Sim Xin Huey (Appellant)Lost	26 Sep 2022	Sabrina Sim Xin Huey (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the disqualification order was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bhavin Rashmi Mehta v Chetan Mehta: Director Resignation & Company Law 27 Jul 2022 Bhavin Rashmi Mehta (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2022	Bhavin Rashmi Mehta (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed; costs awarded to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CPU v CPX: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Incapacity 24 Jul 2022 CPW (Applicant)Lost	24 Jul 2022	CPW (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the award was dismissed and CPW was ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.