Clement Yap Ying Jie

Clement Yap Ying Jie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and family justice rules. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clement Yap Ying Jie has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and contempt of court.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Yap Ying Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Clement Yap Ying Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Family Justice Rules	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Yap Ying Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Yap Ying Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clement Yap Ying Jie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	URU v URV: Enforcing Family Court Orders via Committal Proceedings(Dec 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clement Yap Ying Jie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clement Yap Ying Jie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	URU v URV: Enforcing Family Court Orders via Committal Proceedings 27 Dec 2018 URU (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	27 Dec 2018	URU (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The court held that leave is not required for a party to endorse a copy of a court order with a penal notice under Rule 696(4) of the Family Justice Rules, and granted the appellant leave to commence committal proceedings.