Conrad Melville Campos

Conrad Melville Campos is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and security for costs. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Conrad Melville Campos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Conrad Melville Campos has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Verona Capital v. Ramba Energy: Contract Interpretation & Breach of Warranty(Apr 2016) Verona Capital v Ramba Energy: Misrepresentation Claim in Oil & Gas Investment(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Conrad Melville Campos's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Conrad Melville Campos's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Verona Capital v. Ramba Energy: Contract Interpretation & Breach of Warranty 03 Apr 2016 RAMBA ENERGY WEST JAMBI LIMITED (Defendant)Won	03 Apr 2016	RAMBA ENERGY WEST JAMBI LIMITED (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Verona Capital v Ramba Energy: Misrepresentation Claim in Oil & Gas Investment 28 Apr 2014 Ramba Energy West Jambi Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2014	Ramba Energy West Jambi Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Ramba Energy's appeal for additional security for costs was unsuccessful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).