Constance Tay

Constance Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Constance Tay has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Distress for Rent	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of clause in deed	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reputed Ownership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Constance Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Constance Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	4 cases	100% of cases	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed(Jan 2007) Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute(Jun 2006) Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Constance Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Constance Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	387,099.13	193,549.572 cases	2
USD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed 28 Jan 2007 Kamla Lal Hiranand (Respondent)Lost	28 Jan 2007	Kamla Lal Hiranand (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, with costs to the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute 05 Jun 2006 Kamla Lal Hiranand (Defendant)Won	05 Jun 2006	Kamla Lal Hiranand (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for a declaration that the 1999 deed was valid and binding on the plaintiff and for specific performance thereof was allowed. The court also allowed her counterclaim for all necessary accounts and inquiries to be taken of all the property and assets of MHR’s estate and that the plaintiff pay her 25% of the assets of the said estate. Her final counterclaim for the payment to her of US$2m under cl 4 of the 1999 deed was also allowed although it should be subsumed under the prayer for specific performance, anyway. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD.
3	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute 07 Aug 2003 Kamla Lal Hiranand (m.w.) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	07 Aug 2003	Kamla Lal Hiranand (m.w.) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application by way of Summons-in-Chambers No 601562 of 2002 was dismissed.
4	Jurong Town Corp v Shutters 31 Pte Ltd: Distress for Rent & Reputed Ownership 07 Aug 2002 Jurong Town Corp (Plaintiff)Won	07 Aug 2002	Jurong Town Corp (Plaintiff): Claim allowedJurong Town Corporation was entitled to seize the Strippit machine under the writ of distress to recover arrears in rent amounting to $387,099.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).