Cosmas Gomez

Cosmas Gomez is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and transfer of cases. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Volenti non fit injuria	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cosmas Gomez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cosmas Gomez has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cosmas & Co	2 cases	33% of cases	Rashid Osman v Abdul Muhaimin: Negligence, Motorcycle Accident, and Illegality Defense(Feb 2013) Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism(Feb 2009)
Cosmas and Co	2 cases	33% of cases	PP v Juminem: Diminished Responsibility & Provocation in Maid's Murder Case(Sep 2005) Chew Poh Kwan Margaret v Toh Hong Guan: Assessment of Damages for Motor Vehicle Accident Injuries(Dec 2004)
Hoh & Partners	2 cases	33% of cases	Tan Kok Ing v Tan Swee Meng: Jurisdiction and Transfer of Cases Between Subordinate Courts(Jul 2002) Ranjeet Kaur v Chiang Sung Chek: Appeal on Transfer of Action After Interlocutory Judgment(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cosmas Gomez's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	28.6 parties avg	8.6	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cosmas Gomez's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	85,315.05	85,315.051 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rashid Osman v Abdul Muhaimin: Negligence, Motorcycle Accident, and Illegality Defense 26 Feb 2013 Abdul Muhaimin bin Khairuddin (Defendant)Lost	26 Feb 2013	Abdul Muhaimin bin Khairuddin (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim of the Defendant was dismissed with no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism 12 Feb 2009 Cheong Lai Meng (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2009	Cheong Lai Meng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's claim against the tenth defendant was dismissed.
3	PP v Juminem: Diminished Responsibility & Provocation in Maid's Murder Case 04 Sep 2005 Juminem (Defendant)Partial	04 Sep 2005	Juminem (Defendant): PartialFound not guilty of murder but guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
4	Chew Poh Kwan Margaret v Toh Hong Guan: Assessment of Damages for Motor Vehicle Accident Injuries 28 Dec 2004 Chew Poh Kwan Margaret (Plaintiff)Won	28 Dec 2004	Chew Poh Kwan Margaret (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $85,315.05 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Kok Ing v Tan Swee Meng: Jurisdiction and Transfer of Cases Between Subordinate Courts 30 Jul 2002 Tan Kok Ing (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	30 Jul 2002	Tan Kok Ing (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal to transfer the case to District Court was dismissed.
6	Ranjeet Kaur v Chiang Sung Chek: Appeal on Transfer of Action After Interlocutory Judgment 30 Jul 2002 Ranjeet Kaur (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	30 Jul 2002	Ranjeet Kaur (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the application to transfer the action from the Magistrate's Court to the District Court was denied.