CR Rajah

CR Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and corporate law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

CR Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	CR Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

CR Rajah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	100% of cases	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Apr 2011) Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty(May 2006) Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CR Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CR Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	10 Apr 2011	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant): Leave to commence derivative proceedings granted in partLeave granted to commence derivative proceedings on claims related to KSCCI, Ribands, and Mega-Bond.
2	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty 04 May 2006 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2006	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the defendant from presenting a winding-up petition was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure 11 Oct 2001 Mr. Ponniah (Appellant)Neutral	11 Oct 2001	Mr. Ponniah (Appellant): No order as to costsNo costs awarded due to conduct contributing to the litigation.