Crystal Tan

Crystal Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Crystal Tan has demonstrated expertise across 110 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Criminal Law6 cases
Criminal Procedure5 cases
Evidence3 cases
Sexual Offences3 cases
Sentencing3 cases
Expert evidence2 cases
Theft2 cases
Statutory offences2 cases
Culpable Homicide2 cases
Criminal Breach of Trust2 cases
Murder2 cases
Offences2 cases
Penal Code2 cases
Criminal Revision2 cases
Public Prosecutor2 cases
Felonies1 cases
Homicide1 cases
Hospital Law1 cases
Law Enforcement1 cases
Malicious Prosecution1 cases
Methamphetamine Crimes1 cases
Misdemeanors1 cases
Negligence1 cases
Obstructing the Course of Justice1 cases
Obstruction of Justice1 cases
Outrage of Modesty1 cases
Personal Injury1 cases
Weapons Charges1 cases
Work Injury Compensation1 cases
Wrongful Death1 cases
Wrongful Termination1 cases
Measure of Damages1 cases
Evidence Law1 cases
Causation1 cases
Misuse of Drugs Act1 cases
Admissibility of evidence1 cases
Similar fact evidence1 cases
Adverse inferences1 cases
Sham Agreements1 cases
Complicity1 cases
Grievous Hurt1 cases
Sentencing Guidelines1 cases
Diminished Responsibility1 cases
Rioting1 cases
Sex Offences1 cases
Sentencing Framework1 cases
Duress1 cases
Negligent misrepresentation1 cases
Avoidance of transfer1 cases
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act1 cases
Statutory Rape1 cases
Attempted Statutory Rape1 cases
Sudden fight1 cases
Sentencing Appeals1 cases
Civil Procedure1 cases
Criminal Review1 cases
Joinder of similar offences1 cases
Abetment1 cases
Statutory Interpretation1 cases
Criminal conspiracy1 cases
Receiving stolen property1 cases
Contract Law1 cases
Appeal1 cases
Attempted Rape1 cases
Bail Review1 cases
Sentencing Principles1 cases
Adduction of new evidence1 cases
Abetment by conspiracy1 cases
Cheating1 cases
Bail1 cases
Rape1 cases
Conspiracy1 cases
Dependency Claim1 cases
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing1 cases
Aggravated Rape1 cases
Robbery1 cases
Gang-robbery1 cases
Arms Offences Act1 cases
Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt1 cases
Criminal Appeals1 cases
Newton Hearing1 cases
Attempt to Murder1 cases
Criminal motions1 cases
Women’s Charter1 cases
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act1 cases
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice1 cases
Consent of Public Prosecutor1 cases
Irregularities in proceedings1 cases
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor1 cases
Curative powers of court1 cases
Medical Misdiagnosis1 cases
Statistical Evidence1 cases
Loss of Inheritance Claim1 cases
Road Traffic Law1 cases
Abduction1 cases
Commercial Sex1 cases
Assault1 cases
Automobile Accidents1 cases
Benzene Exposure1 cases
Beryllium Exposure1 cases
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning1 cases
Carbon Trading1 cases
Casinos and Gambling1 cases
Child Abuse and Neglect1 cases
Civil Rights1 cases
Confessions1 cases
Cross-Border Insolvency1 cases
Cybercrime1 cases
Drug Crimes1 cases
Federal Criminal Law1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Crystal Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Crystal Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.1
Complex Cases
0 (0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Partial32.3 parties avg
Won42.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201422.0 parties avg
201512.0 parties avg
201612.0 parties avg
201712.0 parties avg
201812.0 parties avg
201913.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Crystal Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Partial3(43%)
Won4(57%)

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20142
2
20151
1
20161
1
20171
1
20181
1
20191
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

Case
25 Nov 2019
Armstrong Carol Ann (Appellant, Respondent)Partial
13 Feb 2018
Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Partial
12 Oct 2017
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
18 Apr 2016
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial
24 Aug 2015
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won
02 Oct 2014
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
29 Jun 2014
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won