Cumara Kamalacumar

Cumara Kamalacumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Part Performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Global Master Repurchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cumara Kamalacumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cumara Kamalacumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	10 cases	100% of cases	Siti Hasmah v Majlis Pusat Singapura: Winding Up Application for Society Under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act(Jun 2024) Eng Teng Cheng v Government of the City of Buenos Aires: Corporate Veil Lifting and Choice of Law(May 2024) True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cumara Kamalacumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Lost	52.8 parties avg	2.8	50%
Neutral	28.0 parties avg	8.0	20%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	26.3 parties avg	6.3
2023	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cumara Kamalacumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	5(42%)	42%
Neutral	2(17%)	17%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	2(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	542,463.73	108,492.755 cases	5
USD	237,619.35	237,619.351 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Siti Hasmah v Majlis Pusat Singapura: Winding Up Application for Society Under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 20 Jun 2024 Siti Hasmah binte Adam (Claimant)Won	20 Jun 2024	Siti Hasmah binte Adam (Claimant): Application grantedThe claimant's application for a winding up order against the defendant was granted.
2	Eng Teng Cheng v Government of the City of Buenos Aires: Corporate Veil Lifting and Choice of Law 14 May 2024 Government of the City of Buenos Aires (Respondent)Lost	14 May 2024	Government of the City of Buenos Aires (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $120,000 to the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore); originally won in High Court for damages of US$237,619.35.
3	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings 24 Apr 2024 Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2024	Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant): Application grantedPlaintiffs' application allowed, for the sole purpose of allowing the Hong Kong Court to determine whether there had been a breach of its court order in HCA 1469/2019. Costs here and below are reserved to the trial judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	DB International Trust v Medora Xerxes Jamshid: Removal of Liquidator in Winding Up 03 Apr 2023 Kirkham International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Neutral	03 Apr 2023	Kirkham International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Liquidator RemovedThe liquidator of the second respondent was removed.
5	Re Kirkham International: Retrospective Solicitor Appointment Under IRDA 24 Jan 2023 Medora Xerxes Jamshid (Applicant)Partial	24 Jan 2023	Medora Xerxes Jamshid (Applicant): Application Granted in PartApplicant authorized to appoint solicitors from the date of the order, with legal costs to be paid from the assets of the company. Costs of the application fixed at $4,500 excluding disbursements, to be borne out of the assets of the Company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Korea Development Bank, Singapore Branch (Other)Neutral	13 Mar 2022	Korea Development Bank, Singapore Branch (Other): NeutralKorea Development Bank, Singapore Branch was on watching brief. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Sim Kwai Meng v Pang Moh Yin Patricia: Res Judicata & Oral Agreement Dispute 20 Jan 2022 Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jan 2022	Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedW’s claim based on the oral agreement was dismissed due to res judicata.
8	Pang Moh Yin Patricia v Sim Kwai Meng: Oral Contract Dispute over Property Transfer and Res Judicata 20 Jan 2021 Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	20 Jan 2021	Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe action by the ex-wife qua the Personal Representative was dismissed and the reliefs sought by her in that capacity were declined.
9	Lim Anthony v Gao Wenxi: Oppression, Contract, and Misrepresentation in Shareholder Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Lim Anthony (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2020	Lim Anthony (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartJudgment for the Plaintiff for $100,000 against Gao and $450,000 against the Company, less $12,036.27 owed to the Company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	VTB Bank v Anan Group: Winding Up Application & Disputed Debt 18 Nov 2018 AnAn Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Nov 2018	AnAn Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up order made against the DefendantWinding up order made against the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).