D Vivekananda

D Vivekananda is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and personal injury.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

D Vivekananda has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	D Vivekananda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

D Vivekananda has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Niru & Co	3 cases	75% of cases	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking(May 2002) PP v Ng Ah Kang: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001) Chen Qingrui v Phua Geok Leng: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury(Mar 2001)
Niru and Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew: Personal Injury Claim for Damages Following Traffic Accident(Oct 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of D Vivekananda's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of D Vivekananda's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	78,261.25	78,261.251 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew: Personal Injury Claim for Damages Following Traffic Accident 12 Oct 2004 Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Oct 2004	Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for 50% of the assessed damages, totaling $78,261.25 and RM 75. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking 16 May 2002 Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Appellant)Lost	16 May 2002	Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
3	PP v Ng Ah Kang: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Oct 2001 Ng Ah Kang (Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2001	Ng Ah Kang (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted and sentenced according to the law.
4	Chen Qingrui v Phua Geok Leng: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury 29 Mar 2001 Chen Qingrui suing by her father and next friend Tan Kok Kiong (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Mar 2001	Chen Qingrui suing by her father and next friend Tan Kok Kiong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Contributory negligence found; Plaintiff equally responsible for the accident. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.