D Vivekenanda

D Vivekenanda is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

D Vivekenanda has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and theft.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	D Vivekenanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	25% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	D Vivekenanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	D Vivekenanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	D Vivekenanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

D Vivekenanda has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Niru & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of D Vivekenanda's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of D Vivekenanda's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case 17 Feb 2002 Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2002	Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe Defendant lost the case and was found guilty as charged.