Damita Nathan

Damita Nathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and wills and probate. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Damita Nathan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Pari passu principle	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Damita Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Damita Nathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chelliah and Kiang	1 cases	50% of cases	Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement(Oct 2003)
John Tan & Chan	1 cases	50% of cases	Tan Teck Khong v Tan Pian Meng: Testamentary Capacity & Undue Influence in Will Validity(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Damita Nathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Damita Nathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement 05 Oct 2003 Wing Tai Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2003	Wing Tai Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Teck Khong v Tan Pian Meng: Testamentary Capacity & Undue Influence in Will Validity 16 Jul 2002 Tan Pian Meng (Defendant)Lost	16 Jul 2002	Tan Pian Meng (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court found that Mdm Pang was unduly influenced by the Defendant.