Dana Chang

Dana Chang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and property law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dana Chang has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held in bank	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dana Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dana Chang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee: Fraudulent Asset Disposal & Constructive Trusts(Mar 2023) Rajagopalan v The Wellness Group: Liquidator's Power to Compromise Debts(Nov 2020) Timing Ltd v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders and Joint Bank Accounts(Aug 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dana Chang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Unknown	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dana Chang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Unknown	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee: Fraudulent Asset Disposal & Constructive Trusts 28 Mar 2023 Goh Keng Meng, Jeremy (Wu Qingming) (Defendant)Lost	28 Mar 2023	Goh Keng Meng, Jeremy (Wu Qingming) (Defendant): Orders made against DefendantTransfer of monies of S$1,873,320.63 into that OCBC account (which is in Dr Jeremy’s name) is void and of no effect. Dr Jeremy sell Seascape within three months and account for and pay 50% of the monies from this sale to the Official Assignee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Rajagopalan v The Wellness Group: Liquidator's Power to Compromise Debts 09 Nov 2020 EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Other)	09 Nov 2020	EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Other): -
3	Timing Ltd v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders and Joint Bank Accounts 10 Aug 2020 Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	10 Aug 2020	Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, holding that a show cause order under Order 49 of the Rules of Court can be made against joint accounts where certain criteria are met.