Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen

Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 37 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 46.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 18 complex cases, representing 49% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated expertise across 135 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	16 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chain of Custody	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Convenience Class	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of submission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitral procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joinder Applications	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Arbitral Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alteration of Charge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mechanical and Electrical Design	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Design Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fitness for Purpose Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reversionary damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Morality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Venture Capital	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	21 cases	57% of cases	Ajeet Gobindram Vaswani v Salvatore Gregory Takoushian: Privilege & Waiver of Legal Advice(Apr 2023) Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency(Apr 2023) Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022)
Prolegis LLC	13 cases	35% of cases	FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice(Dec 2024) Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities(Nov 2024) Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2024)
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	5% of cases	Solvadis v Affert: Mareva Injunction & Risk of Asset Dissipation in Sulphur Export Contract Dispute(Oct 2013) Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v Actatek, Inc: Breach of Contract & Loan Agreement Dispute(Jan 2013)
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Swiss Singapore v Exim Rajathi: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Fraud and Public Policy Violation(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 18 (49%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	174.2 parties avg	4.2	46%
Remanded	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Reserved	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Unknown	18.0 parties avg	8.0	3%
Won	173.9 parties avg	3.9	46%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	54.6 parties avg	4.6
2022	34.6 parties avg	4.6
2023	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2024	133.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(46%)	46%
Remanded	1(3%)	3%
Reserved	1(3%)	3%
Unknown	1(3%)	3%
Won	17(46%)	46%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	60,050,000.00	60,050,000.001 cases	1
SGD	3,132,450.08	208,830.0115 cases	15
USD	36,236,984.54	12,078,994.853 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Reserved: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2022	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	13 58	Lost: 5 cases (38.5%) Won: 8 cases (61.5%)

Case History

Displaying all 37 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice 15 Dec 2024 FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant)Won	15 Dec 2024	FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant): Applications dismissedThe Rajawalis' applications to set aside the Second Award and the Enforcement Order were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities 26 Nov 2024 Ellyn Tan Huixian (Respondent)Lost	26 Nov 2024	Ellyn Tan Huixian (Respondent): Appointment VoidAppointment as liquidator of ZAPL declared void.
3	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement 26 Nov 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant)Won	26 Nov 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant): Costs awardedPIMD was awarded costs of USD 5,000, payable by Udenna. The currency is assumed to be USD as it was requested by PIMD.
4	AI MTBL SPV v MTBL Global Fund: Breach of Contract & Frustration in Investment Redemption 21 Oct 2024 China Capital Impetus Asset Management (Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2024	China Capital Impetus Asset Management (Defendant): Damages AwardedDamages awarded against the Fund Manager in the amount of US$16,633,540.66, plus interest. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the case concerns international investments.
5	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Setting Aside Service of Process in SICC Arbitration Enforcement 26 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	26 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application grantedApplication to set aside service of originating application dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
6	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Costs Dispute in Anti-Suit Injunction & Enforcement of Arbitration Award 05 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	05 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts awarded in the sum of $319,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Lim Wei Fong Nicman v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Duress Defense 25 Aug 2024 Lim Wei Fong Nicman (Appellant)Lost	25 Aug 2024	Lim Wei Fong Nicman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
8	Pertamina v. Phoenix: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope. Dispute over unpaid petroleum product shipments. 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant): Application GrantedRelief sought in Originating Application No 1 of 2024 granted. Costs of OA 1 and OA 23 including SUM 21 to be paid by Phoenix, such costs to be assessed by the court unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Costs for Contempt of Court in Arbitration Enforcement 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts of SUM 8 awarded in the sum of $205,880.41 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case 09 Jun 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Jun 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartKTP's appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar to dismiss KTP’s application in HC/SUM 2609/2023 (“SUM 2609”) to strike out the plaintiff’s case against KTP in HC/S 143/2022 (the “Suit”) was allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 25 Apr 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Apr 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Applications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to standApplications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to stand. No monetary amount awarded.
12	Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 10 Jan 2024 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Lost	10 Jan 2024	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for extension of moratorium dismissed.
13	PP v Lim Wei Fong Nicman: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Duress Defense 09 Jan 2024 Lim Wei Fong Nicman (Defendant)Lost	09 Jan 2024	Lim Wei Fong Nicman (Defendant): Guilty VerdictConvicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
14	Ajeet Gobindram Vaswani v Salvatore Gregory Takoushian: Privilege & Waiver of Legal Advice 18 Apr 2023 Kelvin Ng Kheng Choo (Defendant)	18 Apr 2023	Kelvin Ng Kheng Choo (Defendant): -
15	Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency 05 Apr 2023 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Won	05 Apr 2023	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for extension of time of moratoria was allowed.
16	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Dec 2022	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed.
17	Zipmex Group Insolvency: Extension of Moratoria and Substantial Connection to Singapore 16 Aug 2022 Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Won	16 Aug 2022	Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Extension of Moratoria GrantedExtension of moratoria granted until 2 December 2022 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Phoenixfin Pte Ltd v Convexity Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 06 Mar 2022 Convexity Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2022	Convexity Ltd (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision to set aside part of the arbitral award.
19	Shanghai Shipyard v Opus Tiger: Joinder in Derivative Action under Companies Act s 216A 23 Nov 2021 Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Appellant)Lost	23 Nov 2021	Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal, finding that the Judge had no power to order SSY’s joinder at the time the Joinder Applications were brought.
20	Imran v PP; Tamilselvam v PP: Retrial Ordered for MDA Offences After Co-Accused Acquittal 22 Sep 2021 Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant)Remanded	22 Sep 2021	Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant): Retrial OrderedJoint retrial of the amended charge ordered before a different judge of the General Division of the High Court.
21	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2021 Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2021	Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
22	Reignwood v Opus Tiger: Joinder Application in Derivative Action 22 Jun 2021 Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Applicant)Lost	22 Jun 2021	Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd (Applicant): Application for joinder dismissedShanghai Shipyard's application to be joined as a party to the s 216A applications was dismissed.
23	CDM v CDP: Appeal Dismissed on Arbitral Award Regarding Vessel Launch & Payment Instalment 04 May 2021 CDP (Respondent)Won	04 May 2021	CDP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CDP awarded costs of SGD 40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Dec 2020 Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant)Reserved	17 Dec 2020	Imran bin Mohd Arip (Appellant): To be determinedThe court invited the Prosecution to submit on the appropriate amendments that should be made to the charges in respect of Imran.
25	CDM v CDP: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitration Award - Jurisdiction & Natural Justice 20 Jul 2020 CDP (Defendant, Claimant)Won	20 Jul 2020	CDP (Defendant, Claimant): Enforcement AllowedLeave to enforce the award was granted.
26	The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 23 Jun 2020 Providence Asset Management (Defendant)Lost	23 Jun 2020	Providence Asset Management (Defendant): Worldwide Mareva injunction granted against assetsWorldwide Mareva injunction granted against the Defendants’ assets up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).
27	Tembusu Growth Fund II Ltd v Yee Fook Khong: Contract Breach, Remoteness of Damages, Promissory Estoppel 19 May 2020 Tembusu Growth Fund II Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	19 May 2020	Tembusu Growth Fund II Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim AllowedThe court ordered the first defendant to pay RMB 30,025,000 to the plaintiffs.
28	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power 09 May 2019 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 May 2019	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims AllowedCounterclaims for a total of $71,347.60 under SCN003(a), SCN003(b), SCN005, SCN006 and SCN007 were allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	Mohammad Azli bin Mohammad Salleh (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAzli was found guilty of abetment by intentionally aiding Roszaidi to traffic diamorphine.
30	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2018 Rahmat Bin Karimon (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2018	Rahmat Bin Karimon (Appellant): Appeal dismissedRahmat's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
31	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Selamat bin Paki (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2018	Selamat bin Paki (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
32	AAHG, LLC v Hong Hin Kay Albert: Conversion of Shares, Reversionary Damage, and Unjust Enrichment 08 Dec 2016 Hong Hin Kay Albert (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2016	Hong Hin Kay Albert (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant ordered to pay the plaintiff $2,496,222.07 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kim Hup: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Tan Kim Hup (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Tan Kim Hup (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
34	H&C S Holdings v Mount Eastern: Interim Measures & Dissipation of Assets in Arbitration 20 Dec 2015 Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Respondent)Won	20 Dec 2015	Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Solvadis v Affert: Mareva Injunction & Risk of Asset Dissipation in Sulphur Export Contract Dispute 22 Oct 2013 Affert Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	22 Oct 2013	Affert Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedDefendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was dismissed.
36	Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v Actatek, Inc: Breach of Contract & Loan Agreement Dispute 21 Jan 2013 TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jan 2013	TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court found that Actatek, Inc breached an implied term of the agreement by using loan proceeds in a manner inconsistent with the agreed-upon use of proceeds document. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Swiss Singapore v Exim Rajathi: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Fraud and Public Policy Violation 15 Oct 2009 Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Oct 2009	Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.