Daniel John

Daniel John is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 55.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 55% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel John has demonstrated expertise across 87 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inheritance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registration of Title	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Engineering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indefeasibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offshore Engineering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Heavy Machinery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Options Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules in awarding Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Harta sepencarian (jointly-acquired property)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Margin Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anaesthetic procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of solicitor to client	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel John has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Goodwins Law Corporation	9 cases	45% of cases	Law Society v Ong Cheong Wei: Solicitor Struck Off for Income Tax Evasion(Nov 2017) Chia Hang Kiu v Chia Kwok Yeo: Trust, Land Title, and Estate Dispute over Property Ownership(Sep 2016) Airtrust v PH Hydraulics: Defective Reel Drive Unit & Breach of Contract(Nov 2015)
John Tan and Chan	8 cases	40% of cases	Ong and Co Pte Ltd v Lua Soo Theng: Indemnity Clause & Margin Losses(Jan 2005) Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1)(Sep 2004) Law Society of Singapore v Junaini bin Manin: Criminal Breach of Trust and Striking Off Advocate and Solicitor(Sep 2004)
John Tan & Chan	2 cases	10% of cases	Tan Teck Khong v Tan Pian Meng: Testamentary Capacity & Undue Influence in Will Validity(Jul 2002) Tan Yeow Khoon v Law Society: Misleading the Court & Solicitor's Duty(Jun 2001)
Lim Ang John and Tan LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute(May 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 11 (55%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	79.0 parties avg	9.0	35%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Won	113.5 parties avg	3.5	55%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	69.0 parties avg	9.0
2005	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(35%)	35%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	1(5%)	5%
Won	11(55%)	55%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	22,000.00	1,692.3113 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	6 213	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Ong Cheong Wei: Solicitor Struck Off for Income Tax Evasion 08 Nov 2017 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	08 Nov 2017	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Respondent struck off the roll of advocates and solicitorsThe Law Society was awarded costs of $7,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chia Hang Kiu v Chia Kwok Yeo: Trust, Land Title, and Estate Dispute over Property Ownership 20 Sep 2016 Chia Kwok Yeo (Defendant)Won	20 Sep 2016	Chia Kwok Yeo (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantThe court found that Yeo held his share of the property absolutely and not on trust.
3	Airtrust v PH Hydraulics: Defective Reel Drive Unit & Breach of Contract 29 Nov 2015 PPH HYDRAULICS & EENGINEERING PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2015	PPH HYDRAULICS & EENGINEERING PTE LTD (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court found that the Defendant had breached its contract by not delivering an RDU that was of merchantable quality and fit for its purpose to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is further awarded punitive damages to be assessed.
4	Chia Kwok Yeo v Chia Hang Kiu: Property Sale Dispute over Medical Expenses and Alleged Family Trust 02 Oct 2014 Chia Kwok Yeo (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2014	Chia Kwok Yeo (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court ordered the sale of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Shafeeg v Fatimah: Joint Tenancy, Muslim Law & Inheritance of Property 17 Mar 2010 Fatimah bte Abud bin Talib (Respondent)Won	17 Mar 2010	Fatimah bte Abud bin Talib (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in her favor with costs awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili: Misleading Conduct & Consumer Protection 18 Feb 2010 Freely Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	18 Feb 2010	Freely Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Freely Pte Ltd was ordered to pay the claimants damages as determined by the Small Claims Tribunal. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Fish & Co v MFM Restaurants: Damages Assessment for Breach of Contract 25 Nov 2009 MFM Restaurants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	25 Nov 2009	MFM Restaurants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulCross-appeal against the whole of the AR’s decision was partially unsuccessful. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Fatimah bte Abud: Muslim Law & Survivorship in Joint Tenancy 23 Apr 2009 Fatimah bte Abud bin Talib (Defendant)Won	23 Apr 2009	Fatimah bte Abud bin Talib (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Law Society v Bay Puay Joo Lilian: Lawyer Touting & Referral Fees 03 Dec 2007 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	03 Dec 2007	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Show cause order made absoluteThe Law Society's application for the respondent to show cause was successful.
10	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute 12 May 2005 Lek Benedict (Respondent)Won	12 May 2005	Lek Benedict (Respondent): Judgment in favour of RespondentThe court found no evidence of fraud against the respondent.
11	Ong and Co Pte Ltd v Lua Soo Theng: Indemnity Clause & Margin Losses 13 Jan 2005 Lua Soo Theng (Defendant)Lost	13 Jan 2005	Lua Soo Theng (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed.
12	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1) 26 Sep 2004 Lek Benedict (Defendant)Won	26 Sep 2004	Lek Benedict (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found no evidence of fraudulent trading against the defendant.
13	Law Society of Singapore v Junaini bin Manin: Criminal Breach of Trust and Striking Off Advocate and Solicitor 06 Sep 2004 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	06 Sep 2004	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Show cause order made absoluteThe Law Society's application to make the show cause order absolute was granted, and the respondent was ordered to pay costs of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Joshua Steven v Joshua Deborah Steven: Proprietary Estoppel & Amendment of Counterclaim 25 Aug 2004 Aaron Anne Joseph (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2004	Aaron Anne Joseph (Defendant): Application to amend counterclaim dismissedThe defendants' application to amend their counterclaim was dismissed.
15	Joshua Steven v Joshua Deborah Steven: Property Sale & Trust Dispute 15 Aug 2004 Lydia Samuel Abraham alias Audrey Shanthi David (Defendant)Lost	15 Aug 2004	Lydia Samuel Abraham alias Audrey Shanthi David (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe HOI defendants’ counterclaim is dismissed. It is assumed that the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Teo Chee Yeow v Tan Harry: Determining Benefit of Co-Appellant's Successful Appeal on Damages 13 Jul 2004 Yeo Kwee Cheng Veronica (Respondent)Neutral	13 Jul 2004	Yeo Kwee Cheng Veronica (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondents' appeal was dismissed.
17	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Injunctions, Full Disclosure, and Companies Act Violations 27 Apr 2004 Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant)Won	27 Apr 2004	Lim Wee Chuan (Defendant): Interim orders set asideInterim orders against the defendant were set aside, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 to the first and second defendants, as well as individual disbursements. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
18	Tan Harry v Teo Chee Yeow: Negligence, Damages & Inheritance in Fatal Accident Claim 03 Nov 2003 Yeo Kwee Cheng Veronica (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	03 Nov 2003	Yeo Kwee Cheng Veronica (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs' appeal to increase damages was dismissed.
19	Tan Teck Khong v Tan Pian Meng: Testamentary Capacity & Undue Influence in Will Validity 16 Jul 2002 Tan Pian Meng (Defendant)Lost	16 Jul 2002	Tan Pian Meng (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court found that Mdm Pang was unduly influenced by the Defendant.
20	Tan Yeow Khoon v Law Society: Misleading the Court & Solicitor's Duty 06 Jun 2001 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	06 Jun 2001	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.